480

Tech billionaire Elon Musk agreed on March 2 with a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, for the U.S. to exit NATO and the U.N.

"I agree," he wrote in response to a post from a right-wing political commentator saying "it's time" for the U.S. to leave NATO and the U.N.

The news comes after several Republican lawmakers submitted a bill on the U.S. exit from the U.N., claiming that the organization does not align with the Trump administration's "America First" agenda.

The U.S. was among several countries, including Russia, Belarus, Israel, and Hungary, that voted against a U.N. resolution at the end of February condemning Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Both NATO and the U.N. were founded by the U.S. and other victors of World War II to promote diplomacy and cooperation between nations as well as to prevent another global war.

Musk, an unelected official, currently heads the so-called U.S. Department of Government Efficiency, which has cut significant amounts of government spending, including life-saving foreign aid.

U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticized fellow NATO countries for their perceived lack of contributions to the military alliance and has called for a spending target of 5% of GDP for all members.

Kyiv sees NATO membership as a crucial safeguard against future Russian aggression, but Trump said in February that Ukraine "can forget" about joining the alliance, suggesting its bid was a trigger for the war—an argument echoed by Russian state propaganda.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago

There is a reason he travels with the little meat shield.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago

The poor kid didn't do nothing you know... Let's not start hating a four year-old because of his terrible father.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago

I don't think lucky was blaming the kid.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I know. But I'm always uncomfortable when I read that "meat shield" thing. He's too young to be included in any discussion or remark regarding his father. When he's older, if he turns out to be a shithead too, there's plenty of opportunities to bash on him too. But for now, I think he should be left out entirely, for the sake of giving him a chance not to become a shithead.

Same reason why I happily bash on Don Jr. and Eric but never on Barron Trump.

[-] BillDaCatt@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago

I get what you are saying, The kid is not the problem though. Describing the child as a "meat shield" is not a dig against the kid. It's about what Elon Musk, the child's father, is doing to him. Elon Musk is wearing his own son over his head to keep from getting shot when he goes outside. He is using his own child as a human shield. Elon Musk has turned his own flesh and blood into a meat shield!

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 17 points 1 day ago

It's extremely abusive behavior. If he cared about his children he would post child support and be around with them doing wholesome, life-affirming things.

[-] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago

That doesn’t change the fact his father is using him as an anti-assassination accessory. It’s in no way criticizing the kid, but calling out his father’s abhorrent behavior. In fact we should call it out because maybe it will shame Musk into stopping (of course it won’t).

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That doesn’t change the fact his father is using him as an anti-assassination accessory.

Do we even know that for sure though?

I always thought the "meat shield" thing was a tasteless joke that someone came up with when the Herr Musk brought the kid to the Oval Office and turned the White House into a fucking daycare center. As far as I know, it's not like Musk brings the kid everywhere he goes: he's got his deputized SS goons to protect him.

[-] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“Meat shield” is not a new term and explicitly means using another human to prevent being shot / killed. That’s all people are saying about Musk’s behavior when they refer to him using his kid in this fashion. Nothing beyond that (by that specific term anyway).

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/meat_shield

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/human_shield#English

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

First off A man is using his child as a prospective bullet sponge because he knows his behavior has made people want to kill him and you want to leave that out of the discussion? The kid isn't the one doing one of the worst things a human can do

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

First off A man is using his child as a prospective bullet sponge

Honest question: how did you come to that definitive conclusion?

What I saw was Musk putting his son on his shoulders. My dad used to do that with me, and plenty of dads do that with their children, and they don't use them as bulletproof vests. Did you deduce this is what Musk was doing because he's so obviously a psychopath, or did you see something physically different from what other dads do in his handling of his son?

I'm not trying to stir up controverse. I can well believe Musk did use his son to protect himself, knowing what a terrible man he is. It's just that I really didn't see anything out of the ordinary when he put his son on his shoulders - aside from the fact that doing that in the White House was inappropriate. So I'm genuinely curious to know how everybody has come to that conclusion.

[-] overload@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's unprofessional to be carrying the kid everywhere, potentially into meetings where state secrets are discussed. Certainly a lot of what's happening is unprecedented, but the kid is just such an odd prop to have around, coupled with that Elon doesn't otherwise seem to care about parading his children before now, that it leads to the conclusion that it is either a stunt or as protection.

[-] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago

Fair enough. Its within the realm of what could be considered normal father behavior.. However, go look for photos of Elon out in public pre and post Luigi.

Report back what you find.

[-] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

No one is hating him. Who said that?

[-] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

14ish years from now “will no one rid us of this damn billionaire’s kid?!”

When you plant shit seeds you get…

[-] cybersin@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

You are criticizing the child of a fascist for the actions of his father, and using fascist rhetoric to do so.

Disgusting.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago

Reproduction of the physical is not the issue. Reproduction of abhorrent ideals is, though.

[-] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's well documented that he's estranged from one of his kids. And it's not like his behavior has gotten better over time.

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
480 points (100.0% liked)

News

25534 readers
3970 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS