1001
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 54 points 1 day ago

Genuinely curious what people want the Democrats to specifically do right now, apart from vague calls of "something" and "more" and "better." At least on a federal level, aren't they pretty much powerless at this point? What even can they do?

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 20 hours ago
  • Vote no on everything like Republicans did when Obama/Biden tried good things
  • Filibuster every bill like Republicans
  • Give motivated members of Congress more power, like AOC
  • Retire the old blood of the DNC and have people with ideas from after 1982 enter office (my state allows office vacancies to be filled by appointment until election)
  • Listen to the Americans who voted for you to stop Trump and stop whining about that in private meetings
  • Stop voting yes on anything Trump wants
  • Don't ratfuck young faces because they are running in seats with old people
  • Don't say everything is okay and normal despite the fact it's clearly not, it didn't work both times they ran on it as a platform
[-] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 19 hours ago

All great ideas. Have you mentioned them to the Democrats? They are depressingly poll-driven, but it's probably worth directly reaching out. My local congress people are probably sick of my shit by now, but if so -- good.

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What the Repugs do whenever they're in the minority: complain loudly and publicly, and obstruct absolutely goddamned everything.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
  1. Figure out what they stand for, stated in two sentences. (From that old chestnut that says that you don't understand a thing if you can't explain it in two sentences, or less.)

  2. Learn from the experts (PR people, psychologists, neuroscientists, screenwriters, etc.) how to state it in ways that resonate with people.

  3. Then, do it. Convince all of us that they care, and are trying. Build coalitions around the message, and strengthen civil society.

The greatest damage from this administration's lawlessness does not come from tearing down government agencies, it's the corrosive effect of hopelessness in the minds and hearts of the citizens as we look around and feel like we're alone, and that nobody else actually cares about our laws, traditions, and principles.

[-] JillyB@beehaw.org 10 points 1 day ago

My interpretation: the right is broadly successful because they are presenting a compelling narrative to explain the problems in America. It's "elites" in business, government (deep state), and schools that are pushing an unamerican agenda of "wokeness", using immigrants to gain power, and indoctrinating through schools and universities. This is enough to get people to vote right because at least the right is doing something to address their concerns.

What the Democrats need to do, is present a more compelling narrative. They can't just be the "non-maga" party. They have to actually address people's concerns about economic insecurity and present a vision for the future. I remain convinced that the first president that runs on economic populism will sweep an election.

[-] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I remember in 2016 when the Hillary campaign's response to "Make America Great Again" was "America is Already Great" and man did that go over like a lead balloon. Democrats fucking love to pretend everything is okay.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

And then Harris did the same and wondered why she lost.

"Everything is okay! Sure you can't afford food, rent, housing, the government spends more on wars than social services, but I might give those with millions a few hundred thousand to buy a house! And I'll appoint a Republican to my cabinet!"

[-] coyootje@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago

I mean, I'm not an expert by any means but haven't the republicans been able to very efficiently stifle democrat majorities before? If they just follow that playbook (delaying things, being pains in the ass, constant insistence on funky rules) they can at least annoy the shit out of them and hopefully slow things down. They're way too polite for that tho, they'd rather just let it happen and hope they come out okay in the end then to risk the wrath of the annoying orange and his minions.

[-] SmokeInFog@midwest.social 97 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

One thing they could do is stop voting with republicans to confirm Trump's appointees. Have you seen. how well the Republicans obstruct? They can get everybody in their rank and file out on network TV to call for banning a book by title while the democrats can't even get their best faces on TV to call what's happening with NY's mayor blatant quid pro quo corruption

EDIT: Trump energy chief says there are upsides to ecological collapse

[-] stopdropandprole@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

agreed. that's literally their job. oppose the other party by whatever means at their disposal. use the press, support union actions, so many ideas. be bold be creative.

they at least should stop pretending that "playing by the rules" and "trusting the system" is an appropriate response to illegal orders, illegal firings, violations of constitutional doctrine, and open defiance of judicial and legislative oversight. relevant video from InnuendoStudio, sadly aged like wine

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 day ago

Only if the appointees are bad (which, since it's Trump and "stuff up the deep state" project 2025, there's probably a lot of bad appointees). If we obstruct appointees that are good, we'll just keep seeing the pendulum swinging when a new party comes into power.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago

Please name a single person Trump has picked for a cabinet position that is objectively good.

[-] SmokeInFog@midwest.social 37 points 1 day ago

I don't believe you're making that argument in good faith. Every one of his nominees have been ridiculous caricatures of stereotypical MAGA car salesman

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 day ago

There's more appointees than Trump's cabinet, which I agree is bad. There's for example district court judges.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

IIRC he had like two or so with good credentials. The one replacing Lina Khan I think was surprisingly good.

[-] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago

Yep, all they have to do is think…”what would republicans do in this situation?”

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Republicans would get one of their followers to bash Mike Johnson's spouse in the head with a hammer like they did to Pelosi.

[-] Zorsith 27 points 1 day ago

Not lining up to bend over for republicans would be nice a nice start. Even a quarter the obstructionism as the republican party has put forth when Democrats are in charge would be appreciated.

[-] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago

Certainly, but like -- what specifically? If you could pick one specific thing they should do/have done, what would it be?

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago

Speak up, speak loud and speak often. Be the leaders of the grassroots organization they pretend to represent.

[-] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago

They seem to be incessantly tweeting and Facebooking, but people are complaining that that's not very effective.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 13 points 1 day ago

Because shitposting isn't organizing.

[-] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

It seemed to work for MAGA. Maybe the Democrats need more bot accounts? Shittier shitposts, maybe?

[-] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

It's also not why people voted for Trump. He had to consistently lie about supporting it so as not to scare off his potential voters. Meanwhile, a deliberately misleading viral shitstorm made out of a single Biden comment had MAGAts rolling up to their polling places in trash bags.

[-] threeduck@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Organising what? What should they organise?

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

Workers strikes, general strikes, work stoppages and walk outs ... organize people to conduct mass disruptive activities in a peaceful obstructive way to force those in power to either move against them or take steps back to accommodate people.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Strikes need strike funds. Dem billionaire donors are not going to fund picket lines and unions (half of which majority voted for trump) are not going to sacrifice their livelihoods for what trump has done so far.

Mass protest is possible, but it won't come from organized labor unless something changes drastically.

Congresscritters could do a little more to gum up congress. Stop confirming his nominees except for the 3 sane options.

As others have said they will have a chance to negotiate when the shutdown comes due. We will see.

[-] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

"But my [insert excuse not to go out and protest]..."

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

…wife and child need to eat and have shelter? Yeah, clearly we're the problem.

[-] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Plenty of Nazis said that, plenty of Nazis had their reasons. There's a word for them - Nazi. Would you get in line with fascists if it meant a sense of security? Would you hide targetted members of the public like Anne Frank? Or are you gonna rat out your neighbors (lets face it you don't even know em, not your problem) to avoid getting into trouble? These are questions the "wife and child need to eat" crowd need to start considering, because there's no "centrist position" when it comes to that.

[-] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

They could reach out to Sean O'Brien.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago

The next real test will probably be the budget vote in the House. Post-Trump Republicans have historically been unable to pass budgets without democrat help, even when they had a majority, so one thing democrats can do is squeeze the GOP dry for concessions before helping them pass the next budget.

[-] quoll@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago

step one should be a change of leadership.

[-] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

Agreed. Can anyone think of somebody the Progressive wing and the mega-donors can agree on?

[-] EasternLettuce@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Voting against literally any of the trump cabinet nominees would have been a start

[-] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

Most of the votes cast by Democrats were against Trump's cabinet picks. (Not that it mattered, but I'll never know how the fuck Marco Rubio pulled so many Democrats 🤦‍♀️ .)

[-] ReiRose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Surely this will be an Onion link

Oh, for fuck's sake…

Also, please don't link to Xitter.

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
1001 points (100.0% liked)

The Onion

5243 readers
1003 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS