view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I thought modern communists agreed his work wasn't really the best?
Probably not but I personally think Debord is wildly underrated compared to Marx because I think Marx really underestimated the important of communications systems in capitalistic alienation and how to fight capitalism. Debord got it in spades. Society of the Spectacle is criminally fucking underrated.
Further, at this point with the Internet of Things, commodities are communications.
If Marx had predicted our current internet communication hellscape all the way back in 1870, he would be more than just an anti-capitalist boogeyman but a bonafide prophet
20% of Americans were illiterate in 1870
Telegraph was being widely used by 1870.
First transatlantic telegraph was 1858.
Many have argued that the telegraph was a qualitative shift from prior communications methods because it was truly the first that spanned the world in a short amount of time. The internet on the other hand is considered a quantitative shift that just adds more of what existed on top of the already existing framework.
In other words, the building blocks for that sort of thought were there.
Fair, but Marx wasn't a technocrat. He was primarily concerned with how the working class could overthrow capital, and the working class was primarily illiterate - transatlantic telegraphs wouldn't have been a relevant tool to them in their ceasing of capital from the bourgeoisie.
Marx specifically wrote the Communist Manifesto in easily-understood language so that the few literate members of the working class could organize and recruit those who wouldn't have been able to read it themselves. Even if he understood the telegraph to be a revolutionary technological innovation, it wouldn't have been relevant to an impoverished working class that did not have the luxury of basic education.
Not that it would have been impossible for anyone to see the potential significance of the telegraph back then, but that was never going to be a Karl Marx who optimistically thought the revolution could happen within his lifetime (and here we are almost 160 years later not even a step closer to that reality)
Absolutely, I was not dogging on Marx, just pointing it out.
And further, while I think Debord is really onto something, his work would not have existed had Capital not already been written. His work functions on literally copying Marx's (and others!) own words and changing the words to fit his own narrative. He called it detournement. The modern equivalent might be "culture jamming" where you're take a corporate message and twisting it into a message of freedom and rejection of corporate control.
And I would personally even detourne this statement from Debord. I think "false idea" and "right idea" are too strong. I would use "unhealthy idea" or "antisocial idea" and "healthy idea" or "prosocial idea." I think "right" is kind of tooting his own horn just a bit too much.