569
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

27 religious organizations are suing the Trump administration over its decision to allow ICE arrests at places of worship, reversing longstanding policy.

The lawsuit argues that detaining immigrants in churches violates the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Faith leaders say the policy has led to decreased attendance at worship services and social programs.

They seek a permanent injunction blocking immigration enforcement at religious sites, unless agents have a judicial warrant or are operating under “exigent circumstances.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

messing with churches source of income? no bueno

[-] PugEnjoyer 52 points 1 month ago

The churches housing undocumented migrants and fighting to give them sanctuary aren't the megachurches you're alluding to. The church I belonged to while living in the US was housing an undocumented family, and the finances of the church were open to all members so I can assure you we weren't getting any income for doing it.

[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

This has nothing to do with money. Traditionally churches have been able to provide sanctuary to people from LEO. Trump has violated this.

[-] zloubida@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah, add division between whose who fight these reforms. That's exactly what the people in America needs.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

You’ve apparently never heard of a thing called sanctuary.

[-] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Yep, churches are disgraceful

[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Go experience the real world. Many churches are just people trying to do the best they can and aren’t evil.

[-] prole 4 points 1 month ago

No, many of the people may be well meaning, but the church itself and the religion it represents are evil.

[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Again go experience the real world. Im not religious but I know a lot if really good people who are and their churches aren’t currently evil.

[-] prole 3 points 1 month ago

Buddy, I grew up in that world and know it intimately.

[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

You know ALL the faiths? Seriously put your phone down and unplug.

[-] prole 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What the fuck does that have anything to do with being on the phone? I truly cannot figure out how the two things are related in any way... Sounds like you're stereotyping irreligious people as low information, terminally online, losers.

The conversation is about "churches" in the context of an article about US politics. So I was referring to Christianity, not "all the faiths." What a ridiculous straw man.

[-] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I understand you think churches are “good” based on what? Maybe community? So pay taxes then , what does a priest or pastor really do accept give counsel or average , novice therapy?

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, “income”, like food pantries, donated clothing, other assistance to the needy. Any person should be allowed to worship in peace, and any person should be allowed basic necessities from a charity without fear.

No one is raiding charities for wealthy donors

[-] prole 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, leave the poor churches and their tax-exempt status alone!!

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
569 points (100.0% liked)

News

28442 readers
3605 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS