690
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] not3ottersinacoat@fedia.io 81 points 1 week ago

The only thing that Americans can do is obvious and yet all I've seen online is finger wagging and "hot takes". Fucking embarassed for you.

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 41 points 1 week ago

There's a reason every American was raised on the mantra of "violence is never the answer" and "if you fight back you're just as bad."

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Peaceful protest against tyrannical governments only work if they're seen as an opening offer backed by the potential for non-peaceful escalation.

Too bad one party decided that guns were bad and spent the last 50 years disarming itself.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 31 points 1 week ago

First of all, "one party" simply asked for regulation instead of bending over for the NRA without it even reaching around to return the courtesy. Second, there is a reason why lone gunmen shoot up schools and not military bases.

[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The NRA, which has been proven to be fu ded by Russia.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

What are you gonna do when the government comes after you with your scrawny ass weapon? It'll work against a neighbor, sure, but the military can see through your walls using wifi alone. There's a literal helicopter above your house tracking your every move. They know more about you than you realize. This is the strongest army in the world we're talking about.

And, even if violence sounds tempting, there are so many things to do before any of that, like resist and organize. You can definitely fight back in man other ways besides a picket sign and a gun. I'm not sure why those are the only two options.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

You don't get in a tank fight with a pistol. Pick your battles.

United Healthcare just lost 80 billion in value when some rando took out its CEO.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

What are you gonna do when the government comes after you with your scrawny ass weapon?

The same thing al quaeda did in Afghanistan I presume

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

efore any of that, like resist and organize. You can definitely fight back in

resisting and organizing are necessary steps.

Do you really think they'll be effective against the man that will happily mow down the people resisting?

When one side is ready to use violence and the other side is not, the other side always loses.

We're still monkeys with sticks over here.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Is he mowing people down? He's purging and people are resisting, as they should. And despite that the only threat has been towards us foreigners. You have more to worry about your fellow bleeding heart patriots. Arm yourselves against those first if you must.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Let's let this post sit here and we'll see who rusts first

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Alright, fine by me.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 21 points 1 week ago

Americans can vote, and a majority of them voted for this a short few months ago. This is exactly what he said he would do. This is what he did the previous 4 years he was in power. Americans want this. They don't even have the excuse of popular vote this time around. They fully committed to this.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

thinking that voting is the only necessary political action is how you all boiled the frog

[-] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

I'm not fighting in a violent revolution against an insane retarded fascist controlling the most powerful military on earth because some people explicitly chose to not prevent the fascist from taking office out of their sense of virtue pearl clutching.

I'm not fighting in a fucking violent revolution against an insane retarded fascist controlling the most powerful military on earth because some people explicitly chose to not prevent the fascist from taking office out of their desire to pressure me to fight in a fucking revolution (left accelerationists), I hope they have fun getting shot/tortured by fascists.

I owe both of these groups nothing. I did not choose to be born and I did not choose their revolution, I'm out. I hope they're happy with the shitty world they've enabled.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Violent revolution isn't option 2 but it might very well be necessary, and I don't blame you for wanting no part of it but we'll all be thankful if it happens. People have had to make tough choices in the face of fascism and evil throughout history and it's only thanks to them that those things have been rebuffed in the past.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yup.

As an American I can confirm that Americans are fucking stupid.

Hope you're comfortable with us having the most powerful military to ever exist. I'm certainly not.

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago

49% of voters, about a 3rd of eligible voters

[-] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

49.8% (so rounding it would be 50%) and 3 million people more than in 2020. And a whole a while 14 million more than in 2016. Eligible voters who didn't vote made an explicit choice and are equally complicit.

They had a choice of a dumbass and literal criminal and a prosecutor and they made their choice.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

All the 2A nutjobs who have been waiting their entire lives for this turned into fucking crickets.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The nutjobs still think he's on their side, unfortunately.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
690 points (100.0% liked)

News

24550 readers
3363 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS