420
submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/science@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blackluster117@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 day ago

If they were a more humane society, we likely would.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 4 points 20 hours ago

Is the argument here that China isn't worthy of the United States' cooperation? We here in the US need to get over ourselves and stop acting as if we have the moral high ground over everyone else. There are a lot of things about the US that are far from humane, and we do cooperate with countries that engage in far worse, often on our behalf. Our adversarial disposition towards China has nothing to do with human rights and everything to do with geopolitics.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

More like if they were willing to embrace capitalistic western values and bend over for America whenever we're feeling frisky

[-] eric5949@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Thinking that china isn't capitalist just because the ruling party has communist in the name is funny

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Never said they weren't. Just that it doesn't align with capitalistic western values.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

More humane like Nazi-America, or more humane like Warcrimes-Russia? Description unclear, please clarify.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

To clarify, what you're doing is "what-aboutism". Asking China to be more humane is not a comment on anything but China being more humane.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 7 points 20 hours ago

They weren't just asking China to be more humane, though. They were suggesting that China doesn't deserve our cooperation because they are inhumane, which implies we have the moral high ground and is explicitly hypocritical. It isn't whataboutism to point out hypocrisy.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

There's a lot of assuming, implying, and suggesting in that take. The original just said if they were more humane we would work with them.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 17 hours ago

You don't at all see how that implies moral superiority? Or are you just giving them the benefit of the doubt?

The problem is holding China to a higher standard than we hold ourselves to.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Try to read up and understand what whataboutism means. Because you clearly didn't get the point of my comment.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

You brought up other societies as compared them to us. It's the definition of what-aboutism, just read up on it again to make sure.

[-] drosophila 3 points 23 hours ago

China could stand to be more humane, but it wouldn't make the US cooperate with them.

Honestly China might start looking moderate compared to what I expect our new Dear Leader to do in the coming years.

[-] guy@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

More humane as in respecting human rights I suppose

[-] kugel7c@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Is there a state that is not disrespecting human rights ? I for one haven't heard of any.

[-] guy@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Degrees in hell maybe.

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 day ago

Yeah more humane like Israel… America has been installing dictators all around the world for decades what are you talking about? You think America cares about humanity? You cant even birth a child without a $10,000+ bill.

America cares about moneyyyyy and nothing more

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago

We topple democratically-elected leaders because it suits our economic plans. People downvoting the above comment don't know shit about history. And that's because our schools don't accurately teach it.

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
420 points (100.0% liked)

Science

3384 readers
420 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS