1180
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ShotDonkey@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new "king"

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it's an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HorikBrun@kbin.earth 327 points 2 months ago
[-] huginn@feddit.it 37 points 2 months ago

The writing was on the wall for proton for a while now

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 120 points 2 months ago

No it hasn't. Back this claim up with some evidence

[-] Xamrica@lemmy.dbzer0.com 119 points 2 months ago

I wouldn't call it "writing on the wall," but they have done some not-so-good things over the last few years:

  1. Handing over data for their email services (which was legally required) (ref).
  2. Releasing a Bitcoin wallet. The problem for me is that Bitcoin is inherently not private.
  3. Lying in marketing. Proton claims "no data or speed limits" for their free VPN (ref), which is just plain wrong. If you download a few gigs, it will slow you down to a few Mbit (if I remember correctly). I even contacted their support about this, and they just said, "They are balancing the servers for the free VPN." But then why was it fast in the beginning, and if I reconnected to the same server, would it be fast again. Just to be clear: I have no problem with the speed limit/balancing itself, just that they are lying about it.
  4. Proton incentivizing free email accounts to connect to a Gmail account to get 500 MB more storage. (You need to go through the "tutorial" steps to get the 500 MB extra, and one of them is to have a Google Mail account send all their emails to your new Proton inbox.)

This is why I personally decided against Proton.

[-] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 62 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

These are useful data for making decisions about using their service, but not exactly indicative of support for a right wing authoritarian leader who lies more in one day than he has hairs on his entire body.

Edit: typo

[-] Xamrica@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 2 months ago

Mostly true, that's why I opened with "I wouldn’t call it writing on the wall." But for me, it shows that they are not as privacy- and consumer-focused as they like to present themselves. Supporting Trump is just five steps further in this direction. (That's just how I feel about it.)

[-] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

that's why I opened with "I wouldn’t call it writing on the wall."

Damn; you're right. My bad. I somehow missed your opener saying exactly the opposite of what you were saying.

Everything you said is true and verifiable, and worth considering when you decide which service to use. It's a lot of reasons to favor the .onion/tor version of their service to limit what they have access to depending on your privacy stance.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 months ago

They are indicative of opportunism and greed, which is exactly in line with preemptively sucking up to a future dictator.

[-] frozenspinach@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 months ago

Woah... an actually rock-solid account of problems with Proton! Nicely done.

This contrasts with the incoherent conspiracy theory spaghetti that has sometimes been trotted out to make the case against them.

[-] sudneo@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

1,2 and 3 are completely irrelevant. 1 is completely normal, 2 missed the point that the wallet (which I don't use, I never owned crypto) has nothing to do with privacy and 4 is an optional marketing strategy to incentivise migration from google. Nothing is wrong with any of this.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

This is interesting. I’m current using btguard, but was thinking about other vpn providers. I have a free protonmail email account and was wondering about their vpn service. Sounds like they are not so privacy oriented. And I assume NordVPN is a similar story?

[-] Xamrica@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago

Well, I'd say Proton is still better than most other options (open-source software, no ad trackers on the website and in apps). However, specifically for VPNs, I would recommend Mullvad or IVPN. If you are a bit more tech-savvy, you may also take a look at Cryptostorm. Of all three, only Mullvad is police-raid-proven to not store logs or other PII. The most important thing for me personally would be that the VPN company is not owned by a larger parent company, which in turn owns multiple different VPN providers. This alone excludes a lot of the heavily advertised providers (Private Internet Access, NordVPN, Surfshark, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, OVPN, and probably a few more).

[-] Stowaway@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

What did you go with out of curiosity?

[-] Xamrica@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Drive - Selfhosted Nextcloud

Email - Posteo/Tuta

VPN - Cryptostorm (IVPN/Mullvad are more user friendly)

Passwords - Keepass (Sync over my Nextcloud.)

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago

Yea! I’m interested, I did not see that coming…

[-] gaael@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Neither did I.

[-] huginn@feddit.it 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They've been cooperating with law enforcement and handing data to the cops proactively since 2021.

Pay attention.

[-] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 months ago

What do you mean with "proactively"?

[-] archemist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago
[-] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 2 months ago

The proactive part is when they shut your account down and report it to the cops but yeah, the cooperating with interpol by providing data that they claimed they didn't keep is damning.

[-] archemist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Where do they claim they don't collect this information?

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 32 points 2 months ago

And then we have the communists making Lemmy. Is there any moderate developers lol. Valve is the only big company I can think of that isn’t annoying. All the faceless Linux devs are good too

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 100 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Glances at the child gambling enabled by the steam marketplace, an issue being blatantly ignored by Valve leadership.

Buddy, I don't know how to tell you this. I love Valve for all the good they do, but they got some serious skeletons, too.

Valve representatives were asked point blank if the third party gambling sites have a positive influence on their bottom line, and the dude replying sweated bullets for several seconds before nervously going "we.... don't have any data on that" while the rest stared daggers at him.

Coffeezilla has a recent video on the situation.

[-] fleet@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

I love Steam, but thinking about switching to gog over this. Anybody have any ideas how we can let valve know this isn't okay?

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean I always use GoG, if given the option. But there's almost always no GoG option. Publishers want some form of DRM.

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

I did this years ago and have like 500 games on GOG. Ended up going back to Steam due to features that gog just doesn’t have. Sigh.

[-] fleet@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

I have a feeling I would feel the same. Its nice having everything in one place. What was missing for you?

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

All the social features, the workshop, easy browsing, and guides just off the top of my head. GOG is still good for those really retro 90s and early 2000s games though

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I understand your frustration but I’m not casting some wide net here. I’m simply talking about political ideologies being in your face.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Link to whatever you're talking about?

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] prole 52 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If it's between fascism and communism, the answer is pretty fucking simple imo. Only one of those ideologies considers all people to be equal.

And no, I am not a communist, and I would not choose communism unless it was the only alternative to fascism.

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Totally understand what you’re saying. Obviously I am on Lemmy. Just wish we didn’t have ideologies in our face all the time

[-] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 20 points 2 months ago

I fear for what will happen to valve when Gabr step down in the future

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

I have a bigger fear of what happens to Linux when Torvalds retires. He took a break a while back, and it was an absolute shit show of a power struggle.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago

Give some credit. Even if they aren't politically aligned with your, they did make Lemmy open source for others to run with.

[-] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago
[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

The fuck are you on about?

this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
1180 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

36529 readers
305 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS