497
submitted 1 month ago by FundMECFSResearch to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

What is it to study? He's already said that he supports the nazis, and it is clear that he uses his twitter as his personal billboard.

There's nothing else to consider. Twitter should be banned from Europe until the nazi controlling it loses its control over it (hopefully in a pemanent way).

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 1 month ago

Right, but what in what you've said is illegal?

[-] TheEntity@lemmy.world 92 points 1 month ago

Supporting nazism is quite illegal in many places. In Germany for sure.

[-] errer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Clearly not if the far right party exists in Germany and their leaders aren’t being sent to jail. In the eyes of German law the AfD are not nazi enough to be illegal.

[-] the_wise_wolf@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

I don't know if these anti Nazi laws have ever been enforced in a rigorous manner. And most politicians are too afraid of doing it because the Nazis have growing support by the people. I'm pretty sure they could do more to fight the afd legally. But then again, they could also do more to satisfy voters, so they don't vote for extremist. Both is never going to happen.

[-] zqps@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is currently under legal review, though unfortunately caught up in Realpolitik and unlikely to go anywhere due to the government disbanding.

Fact is the center-right always has a bullshit reason to sit on their hands. They stopped the NPD review years ago saying they aren't popular enough to be a threat. Now with AfD they say they're too popular to be banned.

Institutions and laws are meaningless if they aren't used as intended.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Germany bans certain symbols, including the Nazi swastika, the Communist hammer and sickle, and the Hamas flag.

But it does not otherwise ban support of those organizations/ideologies.

[-] Metz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Of course they are banned. There is a long list with organisations and groups that were banned since 1951. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_in_Deutschland_verbotener_rechtsextremer_Organisationen

Not only symbols are prohibited. Extreme-Right / Facist / Nazis writings, music, images, videos, etc. are also banned.

Holocaust denial is forbidden. Historical relativism in relation to the Second World War is prohibited. etc.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, the organizations themselves are banned.

Expressing support for them is not banned, unless accompanied by those symbols.

[-] Metz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Admittedly, it is not enforced often enough and hard enough, but in general this falls under criminal organisations law.

German Criminal Code §129

Whoever supports such an organisation or recruits members or supporters for such an organisation incurs a penalty of imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or a fine.

[-] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

We're talking about twitter as a company and platform, not twitter users.

[-] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

The hammer and sickle is not prohibited at all lol, or else the DKP would be banned

Nothing. IF his personal billboard was used to post kitten gifs.

But since his personal billboard is used to promote nazism during an election and is big enough to be able to influence the results of the elections by simply filtering that people can see on it to be what he wants, I'd say that he is interfering in a democratic election, which is a crime in democratic countries.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Have you actually read the article?

“Elon Musk chatting with AfD leader Alice Weidel on X is covered by freedom of expression. His algorithmic manipulation, [which] is intentionally flooding German X timelines with far-right propaganda and drowning out progressive content, is not.”

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure the second half is covered by freedom of expression too.

The people saying "election interference" are probably closest to having something real to pin on him, but circulation of propaganda is not election interference. Buying votes like he was doing is the US is, but he's not doing that here. Violating campaign or party donation rules would be, but I'm not aware of him doing that either.

You need an actual crime.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I am pretty sure that you are just another ignorant USian without the foggiest clue about how laws works outside of your ridiculous country.

[-] Wintex@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

what you're saying is LITERALLY false. it's election interference in germany. his main actions would be covered in Manipulation campaigns in the information space or disinformation campaigns, but you could even make a case it's a hybrid threat. He'll probably also indirectly sponsor them monetarily if possible, which should also be illegal.

EITHER way, the one of the first three actions are all easily observed from the megalomaniac's behavior.

If you are trying to argue the courts won't be able to take action before he gets the AfD in power, sure. Is a law a law if it ain't enforced? No, I agree there.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Foreign election interference is generally illegal. Which is why it happens in back channels and under the table. He has openly declared his intent to do so though. That justifies blocking X and any source of funding Musk can bring into those countries. Hell it justifies an interpol warrant.

[-] Weirdmusic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Then make it legal

this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
497 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40340 readers
3107 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS