85
submitted 1 year ago by laylawashere44 to c/main
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] leigh 79 points 1 year ago

Truthfully, bigotry and harmful content should be reported, not downvoted. 🙂 Our local admins are very responsive, and they’ll defederate from any other instances that sanction or defend that stuff.

[-] ada 55 points 1 year ago

Yep, this!

A look through the modlog will show you that I'm pretty aggressive with bigots. Downvotes don't mean much when the post is deleted and the user banned!

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 18 points 1 year ago

I see the "deleted by moderator" thing left over and then downvote it for effect. Like spitting on the bad guy after killing it.

Yup, I do the same thing but I was picturing Nelson Muntz pointing and saying "haha" when I do it

[-] copygirl 7 points 1 year ago

I agree with this wholeheartedly, though I'll probably have to actually go ahead and live by it too.

Relatedly, what does happen when you report a post or comment? Who does it go to? Presumably the community's moderators, but which of the admins receive the report? There's potentially three instances involved: Your own, the instance of the poster, and the instance that hosts the community it was posted to.

[-] ada 17 points 1 year ago

When someone makes a report, it can go up to 3 separate instances.

  • The admins of the instance of the person making the report.
  • The admins of the instance where the reported account is based.
  • The moderators and admins of the instance where the community the post was made to is located.

Where it gets complicated, is that only one report appears on each instance. And if one person marks it as complete, no one else sees it…

So, you can end up with situations where the bigot's account is on the same instance as the community they're posting in, the moderators might remove the post and ban the person from that community, but because the mods close the report, the admin never sees it, so someone that should be banned from the instance stays active, because the people capable of banning the entire account aren't aware of the problem

[-] Vlaxtocia 6 points 1 year ago

That's dumb, it should tell you where the report was also sent and what their outcome was

[-] Rozauhtuno 4 points 1 year ago
[-] copygirl 2 points 1 year ago

Or if a bot on a bigot instance is set up to automatically close all reports, none of the other instances will ever see it? That does sound like a bad implementation.

[-] nromdotcom@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

No, one report goes to each involved instance. So if the reported user and community of the post were in the same instance, a community moderator could "hide" that report from the instance admin by taking quick action. But an additional report would still go to the instance admin of the reporting user and that instance admin could choose to defederate from the problematic instance.

[-] copygirl 3 points 1 year ago

Ah okay that's less problematic. But could it still cause problems if a rogue moderator decides to be trouble for the instance admins?

[-] ada 7 points 1 year ago

It's not so much even "rogue" moderators. It's just regular moderators doing their regular moderating. If they don't know that marking the report complete stops the admin from seeing it, then they'll ban the problem user from the community, and remove the post, and think that they're doing the right thing, but they have in fact, stopped the admin from seeing the report and banning them outright.

[-] cupcakezealot 3 points 1 year ago

Is the modlog at the bottom of the page federated too or is it just actions taken on this server? Just curious how it works and all! :)

[-] ada 3 points 1 year ago

It's federated

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
85 points (100.0% liked)

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

2327 readers
5 users here now

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS