160
submitted 1 week ago by BMTea@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The Democratic primaries and caucus finished in May.

Calls for Biden to step out down started in June.

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

He also let everyone believe he was just gonna run for one term. Then, when election season comes around, when asked if he was gonna step aside and that most Americans would like him to not run, his response?

"Watch me."

Fuck you, Jack. FUCK. YOU.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

He made no announcement that he wouldn't serve a second term.

He recieved 14 million votes in primary, and you want him to step down due to a poll?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Are you referring to the ridiculous sham they called the 2024 Democratic Primary? Where nobody serious ran against him because the party would black list them?

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

You're right, he never said the exact words. But all of America was under the impression he was gonna step back. He never used the direct words to dispell that either. I'm not alone in feeling betrayed by Biden.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

All of America minus 14 million.

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

14 million is 4% of 345 million (~American population.) Yes, 96% of America thought he wasn't gonna run again.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

The whole population is not the voting population

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's not the whole story. The concerns about his age were present since before he was elected as president, which is what led him to promise to be a one-term president. His presidency was llagued with stories about his age and appearances that made clear he was no longer fit.

He reneged on his promise and, as the incumbent president, was a shoe-in for the primary, preventing a real primary involving real competition for the candidacy to occur. In June, the calls for him to drop out began coming from the highest levels of media and the party due to the disastrous debate, but Dem voters and the nation in general considered him to be too old years before that.

I'm sorry, but it is stupid to acknowledge that your age is a liability, then after 4 years have passed, refuse to step aside so that your allies are forced to downplay your fitness issues and elect you as forerunner of the party, then to be exposed right next to your opponent on an internationally-watched debate.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's the story as it pertains to your original statement.

I don't remember him promising to be a one term President, so would like a source for that.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

As it says, no public pledge. A story on a web page is not a pledge.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I never said "public pledge." You can stop being disingenuous or stop replying to me.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Look who's being disingenuous

He can't reneg, as you said, on something you read on the web.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

No, he can in fact renege on a promise he gave to his aides who revealed it to credible press organizations. You are free to call the NYT and Politico "the web", but you're not free to reply to me anymore. Blocked.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

It's tough when you are called out isn't it,

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
160 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2613 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS