837
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Remember this?

UnitedHealth uses AI model with 90% error rate to deny care, lawsuit alleges

https://arstechnica.com/health/2023/11/ai-with-90-error-rate-forces-elderly-out-of-rehab-nursing-homes-suit-claims/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 345 points 2 weeks ago

CEOs have not been held accountable for their actions by the legal system. This is inevitable with the way the United States is set up

[-] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 183 points 2 weeks ago

If this happens to two or three more CEOs over the next couple of months, they'll change their position on gun control, not change their behaviors that made somebody do this. And "they're coming for our guns" morons would find a way to not only excuse it, but fully support it, at least at first.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 114 points 2 weeks ago

If this happens to multiple CEOs, companies will just implement secret-service style security for the C-suite. Wouldn't even be a rounding error in CEO compensation.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago

We really are just a few years away from Cyberpunk, aren't we? I'd actually say a mix of both that, and Cloud Atlas' last timeline.

[-] islands@lemmy.cafe 17 points 2 weeks ago

I mean having to live in a fortress and being afraid to go into a coffee shop without armed guards is no way to live... it wouldn't be a fun time for those poor, sociopathic bastards. But I guess having those extra digits in their bank accounts makes up for it?

[-] daltotron@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

they legit just send out the interns to go get coffee, so much that it's a trope at this point. these people barely raise their own fucking kids, they don't give a shit about any of those like, minor pleasures. they have cocaine, and other rich people who are constantly willing to kiss each other's ass in a big circle, human centipede ouroborous style.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Living in fear with constant security has to be better than just treating people better, right?

[-] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

They have the money to hire a 24/7 coffee shop on their private island. I don't think it's so bad for them.

[-] daltotron@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago

they already do that shit. elon already has a pretty big security retinue and his ass almost never goes out in actual public anymore, only ever hosts private events with verified people and pretty good security. most CEOs and billionaires aren't gonna be that paranoid, but most of them don't have to be, and they already tend to live in totally different contexts than your average person.

what I'd be more interested in knowing is how this guy figured out that this particular guy was going to be outside this particular hotel at this particular time. this wasn't a crime of pure opportunity, this was something which seems like it was probably planned in advance. if it was publicly accessible where this guy was going, that's a much easier and cheaper thing for businesses and CEOs to solve, and is probably the most important part of this kind of security.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like the miserable existence they deserve.

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely this, this is a nucleation point for disarming the citizenship. Step one for a dictatorship.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Are you under the impression that pro2a people are corporate shills? Lol the fuck

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's funny you think they're not. They've been dick-riding manufacturers and lifestyle companies for decades. How much "Glock" or "Mossberg" merch have you seen out there? Those are eager corpo shills.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Glock and Mossberg are gun manufacturers, not health care providers...the fuck

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

I implore you to learn about the history and funding of the NRA.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Lol I know exactly who pays into the NRA, they're just corporate shills now nothing more. They don't do shit for gun rights and most gun owners want them to desolve.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

They are inadvertently. Corporations say the right words and the pro2a people fall in line. Look at all of the millions of citizens that voted directly against their best interests in November because they've effectively been fed messages that made them disregard what actually effects them. Obviously not all pro2a people are in this camp, but there's a lot of overlap between those folks and people getting manipulated by other rich and powerful forces.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Most pro2a people vote repub because they're the only ones that remotely say anything pro2a even though they're completely shit at it. Almost all gun owners are single issue voters. If the dems dropped the anti gun rhetoric they'd sweep elections.

[-] daltotron@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

as a hobby, it's basically just another form of consumerism, and the culture surrounding it is not unlike that of car culture, with the same purported values. freedom, agency, maintaining control over your own life, it's all just marketing speak to drive customer traffic, and ends up being politicized only really insofar as everything must exist inside of a political context.

there are definitely advantages to having guns for certain populations, certainly, marginalized populations that are already at risk, but those populations already have more prevalent firearms use for obvious reasons, and would probably maintain higher firearms use rates regardless of legality as a result of their marginalization, where more strict gun laws won't really factor in, or rather, would be just another meaningless slap-on charge to extend sentencing.

most of your other actual pro2a people are gonna by random hobbyists, hunters, and fudds, who can't really be expected to put up any organized resistance against anything, and the other half are people who would already be a fan of any plan to march around and take away other people's guns, because they're ex-military chuds, or cops, or what have you.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

they'll just define "our" as "voted republican" - EZ Clap

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 55 points 2 weeks ago

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

Hopefully this makes all those money grubbing assholes consider how many of the millions of people they've fucked over have access to firearms and their location.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 weeks ago

There's an interesting book called Narconomics: How to run a drug cartel that goes into detail about why there's so much violence in the drug world. It all comes down to there not being a legal system where people can peacefully resolve disputes.

If Pepsi stole Coke's formula and brand name, Coke would sue them. But if a rival cartel infringes on your territory, you have no choice but to get to murdering.

Now, I don't know the motivations of why this healthcare CEO was shot - and I don't condone violence. But I will say that I see some strong parallels where it feels hopeless from a consumer point of view when dealing with insurance companies. The whole process, including the legal system, seems tailored to take away your power. So I'm not at all surprised that violence has occurred.

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
837 points (100.0% liked)

News

23608 readers
3233 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS