1768
The audacity (slrpnk.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

How are they hypocritical? They said no and gave what they thought was an appropriate consequence.

There is zero context here and if you were running a business and gave anyone off who asked there would be days you would have to close because you are short staffed. It’s very easy to say from your couch what you would do but when you need your business to provide for your family you think a little differently.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

There is zero context here

So naturally you assume that the guy bragging about firing someone is in the right.

[-] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

A. They didn't assume, they said "we're lacking info and here is a hypothetical".

B. Everyone else in this thread is assuming the opposite and no one cares there. Why only care about assumptions when it's one you don't like?

It's valid to point out the other perspective.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It wasn't a secondhand account. If the guy had a good justification for firing someone, he would have mentioned it.

[-] nnullzz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly I said that from my toilet. But the point is that businesses that tend to say no to their employees about PTO normally aren’t operating in a way that gives employees the freedom to have a life outside of work. Sure, there’s the odd chance that it’s not the case, but more often than not this is what happens.

The hypocrisy IMO comes from the act of “oh well I couldn’t give you the time off, you took it anyways, so you’re fired.” Which I get from a business perspective bc the employee went against the schedule, but why not find ways to not let your team get to that point. Most small businesses don’t even offer PTO to begin with.

Creating an unhealthy work environment, then punishing your people for it is being a hypocrite.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

You are absolutely right. Again all I’m saying is there is no context. A good business will find a way to accommodate for example hire a temp or seasonal.

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

"we need workers so you can't take PTO"

"We don't need you, you're fired."

They told him in one sentence he was essential, and in another, he was replaceable. Either they did not need him for the time he requested, as evidenced by the fact that they fired him, or they DID need him, and the boss isn't a hypocrite, just a short sighted idiot on a power trip.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The worst thing you can do as an employee is prove to your employer you are not needed. The boss said employee was needed but the employee proved him wrong.

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, sure. Still hypocritical.

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
1768 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6027 readers
2594 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS