619
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

What lesson exactly? That if the ideal candidate isn't run, a subset of liberals will pick the worse of two options?

All that does is teach the conservatives that if they can convince you that the democrat candidate fails you enough on a single issue, they effectively have your vote. Regardless of the conservative candidate's stance on that issue.

You have made the choice to make the problem you care about profoundly worse because there wasn't a way to make it completely better. Have fun watching that play out as you intended I guess.

[-] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

To teach that supporting genocide is a red line and not doing anything about it will not get you elected.

[-] kaosof@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, genocide at home, in Gaza AND possibly in Ukraine instead.

Genius!

[-] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Delusional take. I'll see you in 4 years when no genocide occurred here in America.

[-] kaosof@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Even before Trump is in office, his cabinet picks don't exactly inspire confidence in his reign to be any better than Harris' likely would've been.

Curious.

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
619 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3528 readers
42 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS