523
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Unicode13051@lemmyf.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty big difference between jerking off into a sock and ripping a baby apart limb by limb then crushing its skull.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh look. You don’t know how 99% of abortions work.

But do tell us how Mifepristone does those things.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 weeks ago

What limbs and skull are you even talking about?

At that stage of pregnancy, you don't have a miniature human, it is a bunch of cells.

Also, you can also just use chemical abortion methods, where you don't physically suck of the bunch of cells.

And I really wonder, why you don't value the life of the child bearing mother.

[-] felykiosa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

XD there is a big chance that you troll , hat off you got me: D. If not you have to know that during a big period of the pregnancy the baby is not alive and even if he was did you consider that may be if his mother goes to the end of her pregnancy but don't / can't take care of her baby he will have a shitty life and his mother too? If you want a baby even a baby that was not planned well you keep it.

[-] Unicode13051@lemmyf.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

The baby is alive during the entire pregnancy. Abortionists make the claim that it's not or it's a "clump of cells" to excuse their actions (murder). Adoption is always a choice the child's parents could pursue. And killing a baby because it might have a "shitty life" is just a pathetic argument. Would you rather have a shitty life or be dead? Most people would rather be alive but the baby doesn't even get a choice in the matter.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Adoption is always a choice

You've clearly never actually tried to adopt a baby.

Also, good luck if you want to adopt, but you're the wrong religion.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/24/project-2025-adoption-fostering

[-] Unicode13051@lemmyf.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

No, the mother can put her child up for adoption rather than have it murdered.

Hell, I'm sure the child would rather be abandoned than killed.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Congratulations on not even bothering to open the link long enough to read the headline. That sort of total lack of curiosity is impossible to rebut. You can't rebut "nuh-uh."

By the way, do you know it can cost thousands of dollars to adopt the baby? Even if you aren't the wrong religion?

[-] Unicode13051@lemmyf.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not clicking on your link about the stupid Project 2025 conspiracy that Trump himself said that he hasn't even read.

You seem to be missing the point that a baby would rather be alive than dead. I don't understand why that's such a hard concept to comprehend. Do you wish your parents aborted you?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, I realize you lack the curiosity to even bother clicking on a link from one of the world's most respected media outlets because of what you saw in the URL.

See above, re: lack of curiosity.

[-] Unicode13051@lemmyf.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

My only takeaway from this exchange is that you wish that your mother killed you in the womb, since you seem to be purposely ignoring that people prefer being alive than dead.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Again, see above since that is what you are taking away from this discussion.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Unicode13051@lemmyf.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

That the baby is not alive during pregnancy?

Then it's ok if I claim people aren't alive too so it's ok to murder them?

Isn't that what slave owners thought?

[-] felykiosa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

Seems that we are on twitter today :). Hope you never have kid

[-] Unicode13051@lemmyf.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

I wish you the same because you'd probably just murder it.

[-] dandelion 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Adoption isn't an option when there is a miscarriage. Women are dying because miscarriages can't be properly dealt with due to anti-abortion laws.

Example: https://www.propublica.org/article/josseli-barnica-death-miscarriage-texas-abortion-ban

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
523 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5498 readers
1767 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS