60
JD Vance outs himself as an SSCer, SSCers react (www.reddit.com)
submitted 1 month ago by Evinceo@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I haven't read the whole thread yet, but so far the choice line is:

I like how you just dropped the “Vance is interested in right authoritarianism” like it’s a known fact to base your entire point on. Vance is the clearest demonstration of a libertarian the republicans have in high office. It’s an absurd ad hominem that you try to mask in your wall of text.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago

If that “Kolmogorov Option” exists it’s only because you’re in a decently liberal society.

This would be very damning for what Scott is saying and implying here. (yes, im going a bit more conspiratorial here, esp considering his like of NRx (can't recall if the leaked emails are around this period, but I feel like they were a few years later)), but I doubt Scott did that much research or read that deeply into it.

[-] lobotomy42@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago

In general I find the least charitable explanations of any of Alexander's behavior to be the most plausible

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1012 readers
5 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
self@awful.systems
blakestacey@awful.systems
dgerard@awful.systems