59
JD Vance outs himself as an SSCer, SSCers react (www.reddit.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Evinceo@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I haven't read the whole thread yet, but so far the choice line is:

I like how you just dropped the “Vance is interested in right authoritarianism” like it’s a known fact to base your entire point on. Vance is the clearest demonstration of a libertarian the republicans have in high office. It’s an absurd ad hominem that you try to mask in your wall of text.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The point of this post is ssc. Not vance. The problem is you.

Sneerclub is a point and laugh at the radicalizing Rationlists place not complain about the gop place. (And if you dont know what that is read the rationalwiki (not related to the Rationalists) on lesswrong).

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

imagine our drivebys reading the description for the place they ~~drop one out~~ post in

difficulty: impossible

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 12 points 2 weeks ago

But the description is like 1/1024th of a ssc post. Who has time for that.

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

984 readers
26 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
self@awful.systems
blakestacey@awful.systems
dgerard@awful.systems