1389

Josseli Barnica grieved the news as she lay in a Houston hospital bed on Sept. 3, 2021: The sibling she’d dreamt of giving her daughter would not survive this pregnancy.

The fetus was on the verge of coming out, its head pressed against her dilated cervix; she was 17 weeks pregnant and a miscarriage was “in progress,” doctors noted in hospital records. At that point, they should have offered to speed up the delivery or empty her uterus to stave off a deadly infection, more than a dozen medical experts told ProPublica.

But when Barnica’s husband rushed to her side from his job on a construction site, she relayed what she said the medical team had told her: “They had to wait until there was no heartbeat,” he told ProPublica in Spanish. “It would be a crime to give her an abortion.”

For 40 hours, the anguished 28-year-old mother prayed for doctors to help her get home to her daughter; all the while, her uterus remained exposed to bacteria.

Three days after she delivered, Barnica died of an infection.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

What is the course of action that you expect Kamala to take that would prevent this situation in Texas? And if you have one, why hasn't Biden done it already?

[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 60 points 2 years ago

Win the WH, win both houses of Congress, blow up the filibuster and enact national protections for abortion.

Will it work? Probably not. It definitely won't happen if Trump wins, though.

Plus if Trump wins, Alito and Thomas retire and get replaced by 25 year old fascists and things get even worse for decades.

I dunno if you were being sincere or intentionally obtuse, but it's kind of straightforward that we have to win.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

That shit hasn't happened in less contentious times, I literally cannot imagine it happening now.

[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 20 points 2 years ago

Ok probably not sincere.

The contentiousness is what put killing the filibuster on the table. In less contentious times, we didn't need to destroy basic political norms just to save people's lives.

It takes basically no effort to vote. Things are clearly better with Harris winning than Trump.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

You think I'm not sincere, and I think you're delusional.

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago

You arent sincere. You dont bring any arguments to the table while all the people you are arguing with did. Why do you think Trump would make this situation better when he is the reason this issue exists?

[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Roe v Wade still existed in less contentious times.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I am not American, nor the person you responded to, but in 2020 the Democrats won the white house, the Senate, and the House of Representatives.

As an outsider looking in, why is there the expectation that Kamala doing it again in 2024 will have a different result?

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 14 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately the Democrats need slightly more than a bare majority because some Democrats might as well be Republicans.

Kamala has also stated her support for exempting this legislation from the filibuster, something Biden didn't do. She wouldn't technically have the power herself, but might get Senate Democrats on board.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Back in 2020, I read op-eds from several pundits who worried that choosing Biden was a mistake, as he ran on a platform essentially of returning politics to "normal." They worried that once he won, people would settle back into the old routines, and forget about the simmering fascist threat and do diddly about it. I remember this well, because I feared the same.

That's pretty much what happened. Credit to the House January 6th special committee for finally forcing Merrick Garland to get off his ass and do a something about the insurrection... 2 years later. (Which made it easy to delay the trial until after the next election.) That's about it, though. Hell, this wasn't difficult to predict, given the way that Obama decided to "look forward" and not hold Bush administration officials accountable for their crimes.

That is to say, if Harris wins, I predict more of the same. Folks on the blue side will breathe a sigh of relief, make excuses for why they can't act, and do their best to forget about it until the next most-important-election-in-history. We (Americans) don't have a plan to deal with it, and they'll instead just get angry and call you and me disingenuous, or Russian bots, for pointing it out.

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Not actively, gleefully making things worse. Biden is doing this.

Working to stack the Supreme Court, and triggering a constitutional crisis in the process because the Republican Senate will refuse confirmation, and the Supreme Court that was stacked with self-contradictory GOP bullshit will agree with them would be the interesting move that won't happen because the Democrats are cowards and institutionalists rather than fascist monsters.

[-] sour@feddit.org 5 points 2 years ago

What definitely will happen with Kamala is that women in New York or California don't suffer the same fate next year as well.

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
1389 points (100.0% liked)

News

37741 readers
1233 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS