538
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 306 points 3 days ago

The Madison Square Garden rally, operatic in its repulsive bigotry, will almost certainly alienate more voters who might have voted for Trump.

Will it really? Is there someone out there who didn't know until this event that he was a bigot and an awful person and is now going to change their mind?

[-] sxan@midwest.social 90 points 3 days ago

Yeah, the "political suicide" bit is immediately questionable. The fact that this race is even close has destroyed any remaining shreds of faith in my fellow Americans.

Trump could go up in stage and rant about black people, using the hard-R; he could repeat the sexist comments he's already famous for; he could probably even criticize Christians - none of it would move the needle. People voting for him aren't doing so because they think he's a great person; they're doing it because they hate liberals.

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

I think it would actually get him more votes.

[-] paw@feddit.org 10 points 3 days ago

I think they are voting for him because of the things they believe he is or stands for. Let's assume some people cherish kindness, then these people believe he is kind even if he's obviously not. They want to believe.

They are analogously not voting for Harris out of what they believe she stands for: destroying their values, installing communism, surrendering to the Soviet Union, all on day one. Because they want to believe.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago

This is also the thing I think proves that these people are stupid, although I really try to not assume these things.

Kamala is so much not a communist, she'd be considered economically right-wing in most of the EU.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 days ago

8 years later, still riding that click-generating wave of “can you believe how racist this guy is?!”

[-] Samvega 9 points 3 days ago

Exactly my reaction.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Making people aware might give more of a push to people who otherwise wouldn't vote. It isn't about changing the minds of maga shits.

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The first half of this skit will explain , like it is which multi-millionaire who does not respect you do you choose? The one lying that it is all fair, or the crybaby who says its not. Even with a Billion dollars Harris does not feel safe, and Trump has ro go so see Elon (who needs to be culled already). In all this voting third party is the crazy choice because?

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Holy nonsense false equivalence, Batman. Harris's net worth (with her husband), is about $8 million, much of which comes from book sales, pensions, and the value of her home. I'll take the millionaire who earned her assets via public service, investment, and work over the supposed billionaire who earned his assets via loans from daddy, grift, fraud, lies, and a history of refusal to pay bills.

In all this voting third party is the crazy choice because?

Because you started with a ridiculous lie to justify it, maybe? Or, alternatively, because it's stupid and self-defeating.

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

And the average american is a multi-millionaire? Like holy batman thats alot of words to say she can not relate to regular ppl. As in my Chapelle clip, one candidate embraces it, the other denies it. Guess who looks like an untrustworthy liar.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

When has she ever denied being wealthy?

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Ladies and gentleman, this is called a pivot, because I made an accusation and somehow @BlackBeard has something entirely different to take attention and ignore what I said.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

the other denies it.

Your exact words.

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Ummms if you agreeing with me you are saying “Both Sides” then and well ofc agreeing with me.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

You said Harris denies her wealth. When did that happen?

[-] Nelots@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

You're dodging a question you were called out on and don't have an answer for.

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Since you think its a dodge, even going by other guy’s numbers she is worth 20x the average American Source. By the median, shes worth 100x more than the average American Source. Your response?

[-] Nelots@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

My response is that you dodged again. To be clear, the question you dodged was:

When has she ever denied being wealthy?

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Thats a weird take, I said Trump embraced being rich and corrupt, and you somehow understood that to mean that I said Harris denies her wealth. No trolling, please tell me what I could have done to communicate better.

[-] Nelots@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

That's half of what you said:

As in my Chapelle clip, one candidate embraces it, the other denies it.

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Does she admit she takes money from questionable sources? I last saw Harris dancing with the (almost? Not sure) Billionaire Beyonce, asking for more money. Literally has 10000x the worth of the average American, in cash at that, for essentially an ad campaign but dig deep in your pocket to support her. As I said previously, I said “deny” not about her wealth, but that she obtained such wealth through questionable means.

[-] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The average net worth of a single person in their 60s (kamala's age) is about 1.5 million.

So take 8 million for Kamala and husband and 3 million for an average couple in the same age group.

I think that's significantly closer than any of the gop or third party candidates.

Besides, it's not like Kamala is trying to make it a secret (unlike trump, who consistently refuses to release documents related to wealth and assets)

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

The one lying that it is all fair, or the crybaby who says its not.

Yep, that's the only difference between the two candidates. You nailed it!

(This is sarcasm. You're an idiot.)

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Because Jill Stein is also a multimillionaire.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
538 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3351 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS