766

Jack Sweeney, who gained notoriety for his @ElonJet account on X and maintained many of the suspended accounts, said on Threads that the development is “reminiscent of all my accounts getting suspended on Twitter.” The shuttered accounts, which used publicly available data to show the flight paths of private jets, initially displayed a message on Monday that read, “The link you followed may be broken, or the page may have been removed.”

Meta provided no direct warning or explanation for the suspensions, according to Sweeney, who says the accounts appear “blacked out with no options to interact or receive information.” In a statement to TechCrunch, however, an unnamed Meta spokesperson said “Given the risk of physical harm to individuals, and in keeping with the independent Oversight Board’s recommendation, we’ve disabled these accounts for violating our privacy policy.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 329 points 21 hours ago

The irony of Meta/Facebook - infamous for tracking people online - being upset about jet tracking.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 42 points 14 hours ago

It's not even tracking... Tracking is what the FAA does, and makes publicly available. These accounts are just publishing the already-public information.

Fuck every one of these shitty billionaires. Fly commercial if you don't want to be tracked publicly.

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Obviously the way around this is to make an account that responds to any message containing a plane ID, and another that retweets it.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 122 points 21 hours ago

Rules and laws are only for the peasantry. Your level of freedom is proportional to your wealth, so Meta has a whole lotta Freedom™️

[-] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 points 20 hours ago

Tracking those jets isn’t the issue. It’s sharing that information publicly. Facebook doesn’t hand out your personal information to others, and if you think they do, then you don’t understand how targeted ads work.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 104 points 20 hours ago

That information is already public, how do you think he gets it?

[-] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

My name, address and phone number are public too but if you were to share it on social media you'd be breaking the law.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 58 points 19 hours ago

https://flightradar24.com

All I need is your flight number. You don't know how any of this works, do you?

You don't even need the Internet, just search up ADS-B receivers on Amazon. The plane and the ATC system itself is tattling on you every second, blasting your position out over the air.

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 10 points 17 hours ago

If you put your name, address and phone number on a public forum and someone shares that do you think that's breaking the law? Doxxing generally applies to making personal identifiable information public without that persons consent. Those celebrities are making their own data public, or rather their private jets are because they're required to publicly broadcast their location in real time.

If those accounts are collecting public information they're not doing anything illegal. Otherwise we might as well call libraries illegal because they contain a registry of every book author whose book is in the library.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 21 points 20 hours ago
[-] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 points 20 hours ago

I believe it's prohibited under GDPR as well as many local laws.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 25 points 20 hours ago
[-] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 points 20 hours ago

Do you think there shouldn't be any laws prohibiting the sharing of people's personal information like that?

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 23 points 18 hours ago

No, I don't think phone books should be illegal.

[-] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 18 points 18 hours ago

The websites track the planes not the individuals.

The planes might be flying empty. It has nothing to do with GDPR.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago

Not when it comes to air traffic.

[-] XaiwahBlue 8 points 18 hours ago

Is that question really "in good-faith" to "that law doesn't apply in my country"?

[-] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 44 points 19 hours ago

Facebook doesn’t hand out your personal information to others, and if you think they do, then you don’t understand how targeted ads work.

It is explicitly stated in the TOS that Meta does indeed hand out your personal information to others.

If you think they don't, read the TOS.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 68 points 20 hours ago

Facebook doesn’t hand out your personal information to others

Huh? How do you think ad targeting works?

[-] ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

"Show my ad to hornly lonely 13 y/o that suffer from Tourette"
vs
"Here is a list of 13 y/o that suffer from Tourette"

One of these options is less profitable for an ad network in the long run.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 34 points 19 hours ago

Did you all forget about Cambridge Analytica?

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

It's funny how people who get their news exclusively from their Facebook feeds have never heard of Cambridge Analytica. I can't imagine how that could happen.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It has been over 6 years. I guess a lot of users has been too young to care.

[-] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

An advertiser contacts Facebook and says, 'We’d like to advertise this product to a specific group of people,' and Facebook says, 'Sure, hand us your money and the ad you'd like us to display,' and then targets that ad to the desired audience. At no point does Facebook hand over user data to the advertiser.

For example, if I want to advertise my home renovation services to all the elderly home owners in my city, then what use would it be for me if they just handed me a list of those people? None. They're the advertising platform. It's them who targets those ads.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 31 points 20 hours ago

Except you can add a tracking pixel to the destination website after people click through on the ad, which correlates to people's individual profile. To say that isn't "handing out personal information to others" is sophistry of the highest order.

[-] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 2 points 20 hours ago

They're not handing out personal information. If you hide stuff like that in your ad links then you're the malicious actor, not facebook.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 24 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

You may want to familiarize yourself with how their tracking pixel works. In brief, you add a line of code (provided by Facebook) to any given website and on page load that code displays a 1x1px transparent image from Facebook's servers that allows them to establish a correlation between the loading of that website and the identity of the person logged in to Facebook on that browser. it isn't "hiding" anything or circumventing Facebook in any way. It's a core part of their advertising offerings. https://www.facebook.com/business/goals/retargeting

[-] Lennny@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Meta absolutely sells your data. Check out Meta Pixel. A suite you can ad to your website to send and receive said data. Also EU fined them 1.2B for selling data of EU citizens.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
766 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58824 readers
4252 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS