192
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Well are we not stochastic parrots then? Isn't this a philosophical, rhetorical and equally unfalsifiable question to answer also?

[-] self@awful.systems 26 points 1 month ago

fuck off, promptfondler

[-] FermiEstimate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 month ago

No, there's an actual paper where that term originated that goes into great deal explaining what it means and what it applies to. It answers those questions and addresses potential objections people might respond with.

There's no need for--and, frankly, nothing interesting about--"but, what is truth, really?" vibes-based takes on the term.

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 17 points 1 month ago

Hark! I hear the wanker roar.

[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 12 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Only in the philosophical sense of all of physics being a giant stochastic system.

But that's equally useful as saying that we're Turing machines? Yes, if you draw a broad category of "all things that compute in our universe" then you can make a reasonable (but disputable!) argument that both me and a Python interpreter are in the same category of things. That doesn't mean that a Python interpreter is smart/sentient/will solve climate change/whatever Sammy Boi wants to claim this week.

Or, to use a different analogy, it's like saying "we're all just cosmic energy, bro". Yes we are, pass the joint already and stop trying to raise billions of dollars for your energy woodchipper.

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
192 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1394 readers
57 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS