86
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yea yea words.

Trust but verify.

[-] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 28 points 1 month ago

Here's a better idea - treat anything from ChatGPT as a lie, even if it offers sources

[-] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

I think we should require professionals to disclose whether or not they use AI.

Imagine you're an author and you pay an editor $3000 and all they do is run your manuscript through ChatGPT. One, they didn't provide any value because you could have done the same thing for free; and two, if they didn't disclose the use of AI, you wouldnt even know your novel had been fed into one and might be used by the AI for training.

[-] bitofhope@awful.systems 15 points 1 month ago

I think we should require professionals not to use the thing currently termed AI.

Or if you think it's unreasonable to ask them not to contribute to a frivolous and destructive fad or don't think the environmental or social impacts are bad enough to implement a ban like this, at least maybe we should require professionals not to use LLMs for technical information

[-] self@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago

what does this have to do with the article

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
86 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1435 readers
77 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS