116
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Charger8232@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

It's pretty easy to spot dark patterns when you look out for them, but I found a pretty obvious example of this.

Stoofie is a brand that sells water fountains for your pet (I don't know what the problem with a water bowl is, but I digress). WayBack Machine

Plastered at the top of their website is "33% OFF Ends Today- Free Shipping" with no way to dismiss it. There is a scrolling text under the main image "FAST AND FREE SHIPPING 60-DAY FREE RETURNS"

If you scroll down, you're immediately introduced with a product with the option to buy two preselected. The rest of this section explains itself:

Other things are sprinkled in the main page, but it really is the prime example of dark patterns. I am personally sick of finding them, but would love to see more examples of what others have found. Please, share your favorite examples of dark patterns. Don't forget to archive them first so they can never be lived down.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most cookie consent dialogues:

  1. There’s only one big accept button
  2. If the decline button even exists, it’s grey whereas the other one is green.
  3. The decline option could be buried deep under other menus.
  4. The sizes of the buttons

Most companies are trying to actively manipulate you to accept all cookies, but nowadays there are a few companies that don’t resort to any of these dirty tricks.

[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The one that scares me the most is:

Accept all or Settings

And you have to opt out 5-10 buttons and at the end there is a "save settings" or the "accept all" button again in green.

Who has time for this shit? Just for a stupid article? We need laws against these.

[-] original_reader@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

With a heading "We care about your privacy".

🙄

[-] nous@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago

Oh they care. They care a lot. Particularly that you don't have any so they can sell all your details to any bidder.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

They care about it so much that they probably have a full time UI designer whose job is to figure out new ways to trick and manipulate users to hand out even more data.

[-] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure EU law says that the buttons should be identical

[-] alien@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Exactly. It should be as easy to decline all cookies as it is to accept. And user's consent can't be implicit.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

I wish it was legal to ddos the sites that violate this law.

[-] limitsomething@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

That's actually a nightmare

Who has time for this shit? Just for a stupid article?

Won't using reader mode ( if your browser supports it ) help you avoid this ? or those browser add-ons like " I don't care about cookies "

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Oh I remember those thoroughly cursed menus where you have to manually disable 256 cookies one by one. Haven’t seen those in a while though, so I guess some piece of legislation is doing its job.

[-] Uranium_Green@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I'm honestly surprised no-one has built an extension to automatically opt out of them, or at least the major cookie providers interfaces.

I realise there are many extensions which outright block cookies, etc; I'm meaning specifically the annoying dialogues you describe

[-] Far@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

In ublock origin settings. There is an "annoyances" group with options. It should take care of most of those popups.

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 5 points 1 month ago

Aarhus university has done exactly that! https://consentomatic.au.dk/

It doesn't work 100% of the time but it's pretty good

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

You forgot a million switches for each "partner". More like prostitution.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Based on the number of partners some companies seem to have, they are far more promiscuous than most humans.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, EU fixed that somewhat, it has to be privacy-by-default now, the save choice being pre-selected and obvious and etc. But most dialogues are now illegal; no legal entity complains, nobody fixes it.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 5 points 1 month ago

Site has cookie consent dialogue?

immediately leave site (Most Popular)

[-] dwindling7373@feddit.it 3 points 1 month ago

That's what my mother does because she's senile.

Having the dialogue is a good thing.

[-] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

Stupidly enough, that's illegal in the places this ruling is from. What's going on there?

[-] limitsomething@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

AFAIK this uses UX design rules

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
116 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31975 readers
299 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS