569
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SpaceBishop@lemmy.zip 154 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Democrats did this by not codifying

This kind of gaslighting should not be tolerated. Everyone take a moment and block that troll.

That's like saying that the burgler that bypassed your locks by smashing a window is fully justified because you didn't put cages over the glass. Reproductive rights were protected by 50 years of precedent. Roe was established case law for decades and was overturned by a court that rejected how the judicial branch was working and has worked for centuries by ignoring precedent, accepting a case on weak standing to challenge it, and arguing that the established case law was wrong on shakey arguments.

Don't let right-wing nuts lie to you about objective reality.

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

How can you simultaneously claim that abortion was protected only by precedent, yet the democrats did everything in their power to preserve it?

[-] SpaceBishop@lemmy.zip 76 points 1 month ago

Oh you're trying so hard to build a strawman! How adorable.

Roe was established case law. Reproductive rights were settled. Blaming Democrats when the actions of Republicans baselessly dismissed it is moronic.

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Okay.... so why haven't dems baselessy reinstated it?

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago

You may wish to observe that the Republicans have a majority in the House of Representatives, meaning the Democratic Caucus lacks the votes to reinstate it.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago

And, in states with Democratic majorities, they are codifying it at the state level. Sucks for the rest of us, though. I'm moving out of one of them for many reasons, but one important one is for my children.

[-] kofe@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Lots of red states are pushing for a vote on it and passing, too. It's wild seeing "vote no on amendment 3" signs here in Missouri as if it's not just advertising for the majority of us to show up and shut these chucklefucks up. I'm hoping that's how it'll go anyway 😓

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Crossing my fingers for you! I'm hoping that Harris and certain single issue referenda (like marijuana) will bring people to the polls and while they're there, they'll vote for women's rights.

[-] kofe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Same! There's some interesting measures on our ballot that I'm making videos on to raise awareness for like rank choice voting. If you know anyone from Missouri have them check out my YouTube or TikTok! Links are in my profile:)

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That's amazing! I will save this comment so that I can trace it back. I wish you (and the collective us) much success!

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

I saw a “vote no on question 1” sign in maryland and they claimed it was to “protect children”.

You know what protects kids? Keeping their moms alive.

[-] SoleInvictus 4 points 1 month ago

Hope you're moving to the PNW. We need more good people here.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Sticking with east coast for now. Not sure where we'll ultimately end up. Not an easy decision.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Republicans have a majority in the House of Representatives

The GOP gained that majority in 2023. Dems had an opportunity to enshrine Roe in 2021 as well as in 2009 under Obama. In both instances, they decided pursuing the legislation would be too unpopular and punted.

What's more, the Dems had the opportunity to shut down the ACB nomination - weeks before Biden was sworn in. Feinstein waved her through, after McConnell had successfully stonewalled the Garland nomination for over a year. Dems cave on this shit constantly. There are simply too many Pro-Life Democrats to expect they will deliver on reinstating Roe.

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

None of these things keep democrats from stacking courts.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

IDK how that would possibly happen with Manchin and Sinema in there. It seems easier to pass a federal law.

[-] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Here you go, buddy.

ReDUMBlicans.

TL;DR:

Obama left 105 empty federal judgeships when he left office.

Republicans slowed down Democratic nominees during Obama’s first term.

They virtually shut the process down in Obama’s final two years.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

What a life. Just throw out nonsense statements with no evidence, don't address a single counter point, and just go on living with ignorant confidence. I see the appeal of being Republican. Facts and reality are such a drain to deal with.

[-] rsuri@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Logically, the answer would have to be that Democrats lack the power to preserve it. Which happens to be true because:

  1. Ordinary legislation would not be sufficient to overturn state laws regarding abortion due to the 10th Amendment, and even if it was the 2/3 Republican court would overturn it anyway.
  2. A constitutional amendment would require a 2/3 majority that Democrats will not have in this lifetime.
[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

And so why weren't the courts getting stacked the moment Biden took office?

[-] Worstdriver@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Two reasons:

  1. Ethics
  2. The GOP engaged in a campaign of doing everything, fair and foul, to prevent or at least slow this from happening.
[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Remember Diane Feinstein?

She was a crucial vote to fill court seats for biden. She also had dementia and then died. Her absence from the senate was part of what slowed filling vacancies.

Also assholes like Manchin and Sinema - may they rot in hell.

The democrats have become Such a big tent party that there’s no more room for common sense.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

That’s like saying that the burgler that bypassed your locks by smashing a window is fully justified because you didn’t put cages over the glass.

There is no lock. There is no broken window. There is no burglar, because this person was invited inside the house. The Democratic Party has been rife with "Pro-Life" candidates for decades. The Dems on the judiciary committee going back 40 years have rubber stamped Pro-Life candidates in the Judiciary Committee.

Dems will put the GOP in their fucking cabinet. The GOP isn't breaking in, its being invited in.

Don’t let right-wing nuts lie to you about objective reality.

If you wait on Federal Dems to save you, you're going to be left extremely disappointed.

[-] SpaceBishop@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

Cool story, bro (or sis, or comrade, or whatever, idk you). Was it the Democrats 40 years ago that discarded ages-old decorum, stared down stare decicis, and said "nah, that ain't for me," to then threw out established case law, casting doubt on the legitimacy of 1/3 of the co-equal branches of government? Oh, no? It wasn't? It was a group of far-right so-called "Christians" put on the SCOTUS by Republicans?

Yeah, that's certainly how I remember it happening, and, you know, objectively true, so thanks anyway.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Was it the Democrats 40 years ago that discarded ages-old decorum, stared down stare decicis, and said “nah, that ain’t for me,”

The Republican nominees said the magic words and the Democrats on the Judiciary Committee rubber stamped every GOP nominee since Clarence Thomas. If Dems were hoodwinked time after time after time by candidates who mouthed "stare decisis" to the Senate and proceeded to piss on it as soon as the confirm vote cleared, perhaps they bare some of the blame for being so fucking gullible.

It was a group of far-right so-called “Christians” put on the SCOTUS by Republicans?

By Joe Biden's Democrats. By Dianne Feinstein's Democrats. By committee after committee that cowered when Bill Frist or Lindsey Graham whispered "the nuclear option" to a DC journalist. Every nominee since Bork has been worst than the last, and yet Dems refuse to hold up nominations on the grounds of polite decorum.

Well, fuck my man. The J6ers are at the gates. Democracy is finally on the table. We've got 6 judges who will just as soon wipe their asses with the rulebooks as read them. Can we get a 10th and 11th appointment to the courts to balance things out, President Biden? No? Oh well, I guess its game over.

[-] SpaceBishop@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

It's a weird strategy to show up and explain how one team operates without rules and lies about everything, but it's the other guy that's the problem. I can see that you're one good faith fella.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

These two teams set the rules for the game. When one team cheats and the other team steps in to defend them while they break the rules, the problem is two-fold.

In the case of the SCOTUS, you've got a Dem Party that refuses to investigate and prosecute flagrantly corrupt judges, refuses to seat additional judges through the Senate (a thing they have the power to do but will not employ), and will not order their bureaucracies to ignore rulings that endanger the life and property of American residents. Instead, you've got a willing accomplice to the willful neglect of women in need of emergency medicine, the persecution of LGBT children and young adults, and the execution of innocent men.

When the DOJ is not merely docile, we have an FBI engaged in illegal surveillance and detention of peaceful dissidents, a DHS that actively facilitates humanitarian crimes against lawful migrants and refugees, and a Pentagon that perpetuates war crimes abroad. All of these agencies are operating under a Democratic Administration.

And to top it all off, you've got a candidate running on the promise of appointing Republicans to her cabinet. This, while coordinating donations and campaign support with the fucking Cheneys. This goes beyond "cheating and lying". It amounts to stepping out into the stands and killing spectators as part of the event. "Well, the other team just told us who to kill, what were we supposed to do? Not kill them?! We'd have fewer fans!" is a fucked way to run your franchise.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

If they won't expand the court, they could do what the House and Senate did to Johnson and that's shrink the court.

Unfortunately, the only fair way to do it would also remove Brown-Jackson.

"Five, five is a good number. Remove the four most recently added."

You'd get rid of the Trump court, but also Jackson, and it would still be 3-2 right wing court. Thomas, Alito, Roberts, Kagan, Sotomayor.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

If they won’t expand the court, they could do what the House and Senate did to Johnson and that’s shrink the court.

They won't do that either.

You’d get rid of the Trump court, but also Jackson, and it would still be 3-2 right wing court.

Why would you remove the most recent judges and not the most elderly judges?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Just do First In First Out instead.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There is zero reason to argue with these trolls. They are here to disrupt an election and they will do whatever they can do to achieve that.

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
569 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2044 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS