1033
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 248 points 9 months ago

5 day RTO is a stealth layoff. This is a feature, not a bug.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 99 points 9 months ago

It's like reverse stack ranking. They'll be left with the people that couldn't find another job.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 47 points 9 months ago

and the people who know exactly how to waste time in an office.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 26 points 9 months ago

That's literally what we all do in office. Just sit ans chat. It's country club. Productivity went up during covid.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

Yup, I waste way more time in the office than at home, and I waste plenty of time at home. Also, the time I don't waste is more productive at home than in the office.

I still value going to the office, but doing it everyday would just kill my soul. I need some time to myself to get stuff done.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 8 points 9 months ago

I love being able to fold laundry or go on elliptical during calls. Plus the extra sleep and no commute means im waaay friendlier in calls. Everyone wins.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

A.k.a. Twitter and the elon filtering moment

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Brain drain is the perfect way to end monopolies.

[-] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

This is false.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

Yep this has been the modus operandi for businesses who want to reduce workforce without having to pay for layoffs.

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Like many companies, they overhired in the last 4 years. Some of these people are due years of severance (my offer listed 2months for every year after 1 year), not to mention the vested stocks and other bonuses granted during this insane hot hire period.

So how do you remove people not loyal to the company? The most hated mandate ever. Amazon is a company that doesn’t need people in the office. This is nothing more than screwing people over.

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

No rank and file US-based employees at Amazon are getting years of severance. They don't do that.

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah, that was a typo and my experience is limited towards the AWS side which is also facing this issue. But the numbers are there, some people have been at Amazon for a decade, so 20 months (if they had MY package of 2mos per year). Amazon was throwing everything at new hires, because they were making bank on their work.

[-] aaron@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

So they're not paying severance to employees they fire?

[-] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 9 points 9 months ago

Yes, but they're making people quit instead. They don't need to pay severance to employees who quit because of RTO.

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

They are getting severance when terminated, unless for cause. My comment was, this is how they avoid it by forcing people to quit.

[-] Scribbd@feddit.nl 12 points 9 months ago

Quiet firing, if you will.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

If Amazon don’t think that remote work is productive, then they don’t think they’re losing anything. I don’t even know how “stealth” this is at all. They must believe that those individuals could be productive, because they are trying to keep them working in office. I’m not sure why anyone thinks a company like Amazon would try to be “stealth” about a layoff anyway. They don’t need to.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

You don’t have to fund severance if people leave on their own.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

And returning to the office probably doesn't count as an unreasonable change to the agreement, so you probably won't win if you sue, and the unemployment office probably won't help.

So yeah, sucks all around.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 11 points 9 months ago

So they don't have to pay severance or other state penalties for doing an actual layoff. They aren't thinking of talent with this move.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, I think they want to reduce headcount, and this is the cheapest way to do it. I'm guessing they're getting some flack for investing so much in AI w/o enough return to justify it, so they're culling a lot of the workforce to juice the numbers a bit until that investment starts to make sense. They'll probably just reshuffle people around as needed within the org to fill the gaps.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I find that unconvincing. That they will give up all control in order to save what is ultimately a small amount of money. Paying severance to cut people is already a way to save and reduce budgets. To say they will give up control and take real risks with who they lose just to avoid a piddling 2 months salary per head… it doesn’t add up.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 9 months ago

They're giving up control by exercising control?

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

They’re giving up control over exactly who leaves. When you do a layoff you can choose to cut your lowest performers or most overpaid employees or everyone in a small office which you can then close.

These hypothesized “soft layoffs” where they supposedly encourage people to leave give them no real control over how many people leave, which ones leave, etc. And it’s the top employees generally who have the best options elsewhere. So you’re really inviting a brain drain by putting broad pressure on everyone to quit.

It’s just not a smart move. I think we have a lot of armchair CEOs here who think a company would just suck up all these downside to save on a little severance and that doesn’t add up for me.

[-] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 months ago

I am pretty sure working from home has proven to be more productive, so I think other factors are at play here. I worry that returning to the office might be the only way to keep the capitalists from trying to send our jobs over to poorer nations. If the tapeworms think the job needs to be done face to face then it is much hardet to send those jobs to India or S. America.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They've already tried to send all the jobs they can to India or South America. It ultimately didn't work. They can send some, but the language and cultural barriers, plus the difficulty of assessing quality candidates just doesn't make it viable at scale. They've already tried that game and it failed. Everything that can be outsourced to India already has been outsourced to India.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
1033 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72828 readers
2268 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS