466
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kit 131 points 10 months ago

Why the fuck would any office worker whose job is 100% on a computer need to be in an office? I don't understand why companies want to pay for all of that electricity and real estate just to make people sit in cubicles.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 88 points 10 months ago

To prevent a crash in the commercial office real estate market.

[-] Kit 53 points 10 months ago

Meh fuck the commercial real estate market. Turn all the buildings into micro apartments or tear them down and install fields of solar panels.

[-] sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works 43 points 10 months ago

I've been screaming its just wage theft. My city provides tax breaks for occupancy (employees prop up the local economy buying lunch). They are making me pay for gas, time, and car maintenance (and lunch but fuck them, I'll just not eat) for this tax break which goes to C-level bonuses/shareholders. Its just another way of skimming off the top of employee wages.

We worked fully remote for nearly 2 years and the hybrid policy just keeps getting worse and worse. Coupled with quarterly riffs, I also suspect this is to avoid severance pay/unemployment while accelerating the down sizing. Yet our CEO bonus keeps going up and up despite our stock plummeting since the end of COVID lock downs.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Tear them down and build houses. Flood the market of every major city with houses so it becomes unprofitable to buy thousands of houses just to rent.

Then home sales go up, and millenials can ACTUALLY buy houses in their lifetime!

[-] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

That would piss off the voting base that actually votes though

[-] Kit 1 points 10 months ago

Condos! Best of both worlds. Especially in a dense city, a standalone house isn't really feasible when you can fit 8+ families into the same lot.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Why should they care though? It's not like commercial real estate sells more computers. Staff still needs desktops, infrastructure still needs datacenters.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Because all these companies have a shit load of money in the market including real state...

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] Delta_V@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

That's the crux of the issue.

Who's going to buy it for a high price, if there is no demand for office space, because workers are all remote?

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] aniki@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

Property damage is an extremely effective way to fight against money. We should be doing it a lot more.

[-] Kit 2 points 10 months ago

Cloud infrastructure is great for this. You don't need your own data center when you can just rent space on a farm. As a bonus, it's less work for the IT team who no longer have to deal with server hardware upkeep.

[-] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

This is what is so fascinating to me about most people, they don't understand that companies hord their assets in my different kinds of investments when they are this large. Having real estate gives them an asset they can can store large sums of money in that generally appreciate in value over time. If a company is under finacial duress, they can fire a bunch of employees, then sale the land where those employees worked and and save themselves from much larger losses on revenue for a given time period.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Both major companies I've worked for sold their commercial real estate and leased it back as one of their very first measures when cost cuts were needed. What we have here is essentially the reverse where tech companies scare off their workforce and industry knowledge and drive up employee costs so they can impart some secondary effect on the commercial real estate market... so yes i remain confused about the priorities in play here.

[-] erwan@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Why would Dell care about the commercial office real estate market?

[-] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

You do understand that large corporations invest in many kinds of assets in order to diversify them right? Real estate is one of the oldest investments any entity can make, and is often considered a pretty strong investment. Everyone needs land right?

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

they bought instead of rented? iunno

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 24 points 10 months ago

Some people are bad at working remote, and want to drag the rest of us down with them, too.

Yes, it's a slightly different skill set to work remote. You have to be better at the written word. You can't just roll up to someone's desk and be like "have a minute?" (which is fucking awful anyway). You also need to be responsive and set your status appropriately. A lot of coworkers just wander off and leave their slack status as active. To my mind if you're running an errand longer than taking a dump, you should update your status.

[-] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

I just have slack running on my phone. If I'm at IKEA instead of my computer and someone wants something, I'll just tell them I'll take a look at it after lunch. If I'm out biking in the afternoon, I just tell them I'll take a look at it tomorrow morning.

If someone wants something really urgently, I'll tell them to give me thirty minutes. Thirty minutes later I'll tell them that the results are inconclusive and this will need more time, for which I have scheduled a block for tomorrow.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A response (or status!) on slack that's like "I'm at the grocery, back in 20" is fine with me. It's more annoying when someone wanders away with no status and is unresponsive for hours.

[-] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

I'm obviously exaggerating. I got some stupid "top slacker" award at the last company function. My wife told me that actually does not shine a good light on me.

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

So managers and other poor personality types have someone to torment. This is said flippantly but I'm quite serious.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

probably because their cost is sunk in the real estate already and no one wants to buy it.

[-] leisesprecher@feddit.org 3 points 10 months ago

Especially in sales and finance: every call is potentially on the record, and that's a problem.

A lot of internal communication in these departments is, to put it mildly, legally not without interest. A quick chat after a meeting is completely off the record, an email is not.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Quick answer to that......you forget everything said off the record.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
466 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73370 readers
3831 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS