354
South Carolina executes first man in 13 years despite new evidence of innocence
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
354 points (100.0% liked)
News
23296 readers
3064 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Henry McMaster, John W Kirttredge, John Cannon Few, George C James Jr., David Garrison Hill, Letitia Hamilton Verdin, should be charged with conspiracy to commit murder.
The witness Steven Golden should be now tried as guilty of murder of Kalil Divine Black Sun Allah.*
I'm tired of "state" immunity when it's a few individuals doing this.
Edit: the more I think about this? The executioner should be charged with murder. ~~The witnesses to the execution with conspiracy as well.~~ It needs to stop. This guy knew until his last moment of consciousness he didn't shoot that woman. This wasn't just a state murder - this was a lynching.
Edit 2: Alan McCroy Wilson too. We're making a list. It sure would suck if a future president and Congress decided to make laws that removed the "protections" these people have.
Edit 3: Appreciating the constructive criticism here. I've struck the witnesses of the execution as I didn't know what the witnesses really were. I'm conflicted on Steven though. On one hand - he committed perjury, leading to an innocent man getting executed. On the other hand, we wouldn't know he was innocent without him recanting his testimony. The problem here is that if you don't do something, the obvious thing is to testify against another party in exchange for leniency and then recant it later.
The guy who came forward and recanted his testimony? I guess no one should ever do that again if they're gonna be found guilty of murder for it
Well, his act of testifying falsely may have led to the death of an innocent man.
He later recanted, which did not save the accused.
In sentencing, admission of guilt is usually taken into account as evidence of remorse, but it doesn't excuse the crime.
Or his initial testimony was truthful, and he just didn't want to see the guy executed.
Then why would he admit to perjury? Recanting testimony is admission of lying under oath. I don't see a way out of this for him. I did add an asterisk to it.
Add Alan Wilson, as attonery general he refused to act.
He's on the list now.
You lost me at executing the people who were observing the execution, wtf?
I didn't say execute any of them? Holy hell, this damn thing is about how the death penalty ends up killing Innocents, why the fuck would we execute them?
OK, I misread it, but still though going after anyone who saw the execution is ridiculous and the gallery often includes family members of the person being executed. You want to charge them with conspiracy? Really?
Really? That's horrifying. I figured it was a group of lawyers and police or some shit. I'll strike that one.