736
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Voyajer@lemmy.world 122 points 4 weeks ago
[-] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 48 points 4 weeks ago

The whole chart is rather fascinating and eye opening: Vehicle visibility

[-] TownhouseGloryHole@lemmy.world 31 points 4 weeks ago

Astounding. Hummer H2 beating the Sierra by 3m is incredible. A truck designed almost exclusively to express how selfish you are and it has better viability.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

This chart is eye-opening...I always thought Hummers were made by...Hummer...

[-] pemptago@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 weeks ago

GM marketing. They purchased the hummer brand from AM General. OG Hummer (later renamed H1) was based on AM General's military Humvee design, but released to the civilian market. H2 and H3 were designed by GM for mass marketing. Can be seen in the price. H1 nearly 10x more than H2 and H3.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Also, the H1 was 10x better for what it was designed for than the H2 and H3.

The H1 was not designed for commuting to work.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

I'm not sure what it was designed for. It doesn't have a lot of space for hauling compared to its size. It's not great for offroading. It's a plastic money extraction machine.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

The original was designed to play military at home.it was not a pickup truck or a dedicated and modded offroad machine, and yes it was a money pit. But it was perfect for pretending with a civilian version of the vehicle manufacturrd on the same line as the real thing.

H2 and H3 models were just mediocre rebranded SUVs with hints of the original hummer body lines.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Oh, neat. Thanks for all the information

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

The H2 was just a Tahoe with a different body on it.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Now my mind is really blown. I'm aware of this happening, just not with the H2

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Thanks, embedding:

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 weeks ago

An articulated quarry hauler is barely worse than a pick-up truck

‘murca

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

I'd be curious to see that chart for a Toyota Yaris. I drove one for a few years and it was almost unnerving how little hood it had.

[-] Krzd@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Same here. Going from a 1990 VW Passat to a 2009 Yaris was wild.

[-] kobra@lemm.ee 25 points 4 weeks ago

I will gladly trade my SUV in for a gently used M1

[-] Blackout@fedia.io 10 points 4 weeks ago

Only 20 gallons to the mile, not bad

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Absolutely nobody will cut you off in traffic, though. At least nobody who wants to see the next sunrise...

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

what if the M1 doesn’t have a touch screen though

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 5 points 4 weeks ago

good
touchscreens should be banned from vehicles

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

It actually does, but it's a hundred times more useful. It helps make things go boom.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

Touch targeting

[-] nothing@lemm.ee 8 points 4 weeks ago

This is actually a good point. And here's a video discussing the issue.

https://youtu.be/YpuX-5E7xoU?si=cmwWAFTUyAFt40mL

[-] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

This is misleading because being higher up you can see much better further ahead, and over obstacles and barriers. Your special awareness is much better at distances that are relevant for avoiding collisions. If something is 1.5m away its too late anyway.

The angle is also incorrect because they are putting the eyes of the driver straight in line with the hood, which is not how its been in any vehicle I've ever driven, the head should be higher or further forward.

[-] Voyajer@lemmy.world 52 points 4 weeks ago

The origin of the line is at head height...

Also these vehicles gain in distant visibility at the expense of everyone else on the road, blocking their views.

[-] Silentiea 19 points 4 weeks ago

Also, an astounding proportion of fatal pedestrian collisions happen at low-speed, close to home where these sightlines explicitly matter.

[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

The best way to avoid getting into an accident is to see it long before you get there. But situational awareness is not something the vast majority of drivers actually practice or have..........

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago

You don't want to see "over" obstacles close to your vehicle when said obstacles are in fact human beings standing in front of your car.

At parking lot speeds, 1.5 meters is also not "too late," and it certainly isn't when you are at a standstill but need to determine if it is safe to move or if there is a small person in front of your vehicle, i.e. in the school pickup line, or in a parking lot, or your own driveway.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Ooo ooo we can do it like buses do. We'll put a bar on the front that folds out. 3 year olds totally know what that is right? They'll just get out of the way!

(/s)

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

You need one with a hand on the end, and the motor that drives it is strong enough to pimp slap people out of the way.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
736 points (100.0% liked)

News

23177 readers
2816 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS