885
submitted 3 months ago by 101@feddit.org to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago

Someone should saw off the legs of the techbros that came up with the idea of removing the headphone jacks from phones. Just like the headphone jacks, legs are technologically "superseeded" by cars and electronic wheelchairs.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago

Most people don't care, don't use it and it saves cost and thickness. I think they are smarter than you on this.

You are not their target audience, they know there's not enough of you for it to make a difference.

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago

It saves an amount of money so minuscule it literally makes no difference.

As for thickness, the iPhone 15 is 7.8 mm thick. You cannot in good faith believe that a 3.5 mm headphone jack can't fit in it.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Wouldn’t they have to sacrifice like three* minutes of battery life or something though? Everything packed sooo tightly.

*or 10 or 30, somebody here probably can make a really good educated guess

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Depending on the internal design of the phone, maybe.

But batteries are rectangular and they can't put them EVERYWHERE. There are places (such as near the USB port) where you can't really put battery no matter what because there have to be things that would interfere with the rectangular battery.

So it might have an effect, but not necessarily, depending on design, and it might be smaller than you'd think.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Phones are so thin now that people are crying back the thicker ones...

[-] 10_0@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Wouldn't be surprised if they have trackers on the iPhone to survey if ppl use the headphone jack 😂

[-] 10_0@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago

Think they do it to save like 10 pence on tens of thousands of phones, but that's what happens when you are legally required to chase profit and the only way to do it is to enshitefy your product

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

And then you can sell USB-C -> Jack converters (which break after a while - I've dismantled one for recycling for my Raspberry Pi, later I might make one epoxy potted for my phone), easy to lose wireless earbuds, etc.

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

If the fucking usb c audio was at least consistent, but no, the dongles are different and the phones are different, good luck trying to not blow up ypur phone by buying the wrong accessory (I blame the spec, not that I've read it)

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Best if you get one of those USB DACs. Those even work on a PC with a converter.

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

They did it to improve water resistance and to sell the more expensive wireless earpods.

[-] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

which don't really matter unless the difference allows your phones to survive a full cycle in a washing machine. So far many phones which removed the headphone jack still does not.

[-] 10_0@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

That is an added benefit or apple and google

[-] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 3 months ago

I've literally never used the headphone jack on a phone in 10 years.
And I wonder how many would still want it back if they realized the phones then were bricked after getting submerged in water like they used to.

[-] Lileath 23 points 3 months ago

There are many phones with a headphone jack that have an IP68 rating which invalidates your whole point. If the headphone jack was so compromising then Apple would have needed to remove the charging port as well.

[-] InputZero@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

A sick and twisted part of me wants to see charging ports removed too. Every port! Make it IP69+ compliant. Maybe then the careless kids I know might keep a device alive for more than a year. Ultimately all that would do is barely solve one problem and introduce a whole lot of other problems.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 months ago

Phones became waterproof before removing headphone jacks became a trend. You're talking nonsense.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Headphone jacks can be waterproofed, manufacturers are just lazy.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

About 10 years ago I used headphones daily, now I do so just frequently enough that it's irritating to realize I need to purchase a dongle just to do so and go "well I guess I'm not listening to music/podcasts right now"

What I learned when working for a phone manufacturer is that the headphone jack usage varies by product segment. Cheaper phone users use the headphone jack far more frequently than premium phone users, so they'd keep it on the budget models but drop it on the higher end models. They also did similar with NFC and wireless charging which was interesting...

[-] refalo@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

Most people don't use them and never did, all the people downvoting are just salty because they're not the target audience.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago

People are downvoting because the comment is flat-out wrong.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

There is no right or wrong, it's all subjective opinion.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago

Nope.

if they realized the phones then were bricked after getting submerged in water like they used to.

This is not subjective, it's objectively false.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

it objectively depends on the design of each individual phone

[-] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So we agree, you were wrong about it "all being subjective opinion."

[-] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

No, something being objective or not is still someone's opinion ultimately. And there's still no right or wrong. There's subjective and objective, though.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, something being objective or not is still someone's opinion ultimately.

Absolutely incorrect.

And there's still no right or wrong.

Also incorrect. Right and wrong exist. For example, you're wrong right now.

[-] Roldyclark@literature.cafe 1 points 3 months ago

I do. I don’t use wireless headphones, and the dongle sucks. And hate having earbuds with a proprietary jack I can’t use elsewhere. Plus I used my iPhone as a synth/drum machine and needed to charge and play at the same time.

[-] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I wouldn't mind if they replaced TRRS with a better connector. I get that the jack is a large part and it's difficult to seal against water ingress. The wiper contacts on it are also unreliable, and the plug doesn't release well when your cord snags.

Multiplexing headphones with my one and only charging port is absolutely the worst possible answer.

(Did i forget to mention that I want it to be an open connector? One that any vendor can make without Apple's permission?)

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

(Did i forget to mention that I want it to be an open connector? One that any vendor can make without Apple's permission?)

Apple ditched Lightning last year. All iPhones from the 15 forward are USB-C.

[-] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago

Lightning and USB-C are both equally terrible headphone plugs.

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Sure, in that the port is far more versatile than it needs to be for audio output. I’m not arguing otherwise.

[-] aeharding@vger.social 5 points 3 months ago

I don’t remember the last time I needed/missed 3.5mm

[-] prole 2 points 3 months ago

Meh, I haven't really missed it as much as I expected. The one and only (pretty minor in my case) issue I've run into is not being able to charge the phone while connected to the car's stereo. Though it wouldn't surprise me if you could just use a usb-c splitter to do that.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Fair point, at least they should give us two USB-C ports, at least on the flagship models.

[-] 10_0@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I did a arm chair calculation and the money saved on not having a headphone jack at 0.10pence per peice, and found that they didn't spend 200,000 quid on headphone jacks. (I read that since iphones after 6 don't have it, so that's 28 models of phone, that's millions of phones, so I guessed 2million phones multiplied by 0.10 which gave me 200,000.)

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
885 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45895 readers
1121 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS