258
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I also use it for that pretty often. I always double check and usually it's pretty good. Once in a great while it turns the summary into a complete shitshow but I always catch it on a reread, ask a second time, and it fixes things up. My biggest problem is that I'm dragged into too many useless meetings every week and this saves a ton of time over rereading entire transcripts and doing a poor job of summarizing because I have real work to get back to.

I also use it as a rubber duck. It works pretty well if you tell it what it's doing and tell it to ask questions.

[-] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago

Isn't the whole point of rubber duck debugging that the method works when talking to a literal rubber duck?

[-] self@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

what if your rubber duck released just an entire fuckton of CO2 into the environment constantly, even when you weren’t talking to it? surely that means it’s better

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
258 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1427 readers
95 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS