1627
We can't be friends. (64.media.tumblr.com)
submitted 1 month ago by DougHolland@lemmy.world to c/aiop@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

No one is saying kill them, they can't exist, or we can't have a civil discussion about topics. We're saying if you hate people because of who they love, their race, their gender, etc., we're not going to be friends. They can learn to have some compassion and we can revisit.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No one is saying ... we can’t have a civil discussion

Plenty of people are saying that, and it's implied by insisting on ostracization for political opinions. How can you have a civil discussion with people who have a self-reinforcing low bar for cutting people out of their life for disagreements? This is how cults operate; isolate and control people by demanding they only associate with people who agree with the defined dogma.

This isn't to say you can't personally decide you don't want to be friends with someone because they are hateful people. But the OP post seems to be generalizing to all Republicans, and to me where this seems to be going is a society that says, you need to pick a side, and always stay within the confines of that side's accepted views, and only spit on people from the other side, or be outcast yourself.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

It literally says "we can't be friends" in the original post. Someone in the comments might have said cut off people from society, but I didn't see it.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What I'm saying is I think the implication of the OP and the larger related sentiment is a society where social relationships are along party lines, and crossing those lines de-facto means being cut off from society. It doesn't need to be made explicit for that to be the consequence.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I think the intent of your point is fine. I just think you're arguing against something that wasn't brought up in the original post.

[-] VerticaGG 2 points 1 month ago
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
1627 points (100.0% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

650 readers
168 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS