410
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
  • Ukrainian's shock offensive on Russia's Kursk region came as a surprise even to Ukraine's soldiers.
  • "We joked that it wasn't April 1st," a Ukrainian soldier told The Economist.
  • The country's troops did suspect that an invasion was imminent after they were issued new equipment.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] index@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

"the orders to invade Russia"

If it's true that there were orders from the top to invade russia and that soldiers where waiting for these it sounds like the government is giving out plans and commanding the army. The government of ukraine and people from ukraine are two different things. When people ask what's the alternative to send billions to the ukrainian government what they need to understand is that people can defend themself even without an authority on top of them playing war games with soldiers and possibly forcing conscript to go on missions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobilization_in_Ukraine#2024

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 130 points 11 months ago

the government is giving out plans and commanding the army

Yeah, that's typically how the military works.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that’s typically how the military works.

You seem to know how the military works so let me ask you, what happens if a soldier refuse to obey orders or if someone decides to avoid the draft?

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That has nothing to do with your assertion that top-down direction in the army is weird or that the military is somehow not part of the government.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago

Fascists think the military should give orders to the civilian government.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 118 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No they cannot.

A disorderly mob is no more an army than a stack of building materials is a house.

- Socrates

This is even more true today as the amount of technology and co-ordination required to field a successful force is many orders of magnitude more complex. It is truly insane to suggest that people can just 'defend themselves' against an army unless I'm grossly misunderstanding your point.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

No they cannot.

People have always found ways to defend themself and have always fought against tyrants.

  • Socrates

You are quoting someone who was fine with slavery and probably lived an aristrocratic life.

This is even more true today as the amount of technology and co-ordination required to field a successful force is many orders of magnitude

You may have missed the part where ukrainians were defending themself from the second biggest army in the world with homemade drones.

Defending yourself and launching invasions or orchestrating soldiers are two different things

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 33 points 11 months ago

I never claimed that defending yourself was the same as commanding an army. In fact my whole point was that it's not. You haven't addressed the core criticism of your post which is that a group of individuals can in no way be as effective as an army.

Yes Ukrainians have been defending themselves with home made drones...and jets, and artillery, and air defence missiles, and ... an army. That's why there is still a Ukraine.

"People will always find a way" is a nice sentiment but I wouldn't bet my life or the lives of my family and countrymen on it.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

group of individuals can in no way be as effective as an army.

They don't have to, their goal is to defend themself not to be the tool of same politician and invade other countries.

“People will always find a way” is a nice sentiment

That's what they have been doing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partisan_(military)

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 months ago

Yes, they do have to because an army is what they're up against. I feel like we're living in different dimensions here or something. How do you expect a group of individuals to shoot down jets and incoming rockets, or form supply lines, or strategise at the level required to mount an effective defence, or maintain the necessary international relationships to ensure bullets keep getting delivered? That's barely even scratching the surface.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago
[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

Yes, those things exist. And therefore?

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

that's an answer to your previous question, i suggest you to open these link and read them.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Alright, mate. As fun as it's been I guess we're done here then. Suffice to say we are all glad you're not in charge of the defence of Ukraine

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ah the old, I can't defend my stance so I'll link a lot stuff and say "do your own research.". Weak attempt to distance yourself. If you actually understood and were able to defend your point you would. You didn't because you can't lol.

Let's just link the concept of guerrilla warfare like it means anything. It's failed multiple times throughout history but just the concept of it existing process my point! What a brain dead take.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

They don't have to, their goal is to defend themself not to be the tool of same politician and invade other countries.

Ahh ok. So you know nothing about military warfare at all. Scattered resistance against an army is nothing but cleanup. The defense needs to be organized to be effective. How are you not embarrassed saying this BS?

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

People have always found ways to defend themself and have always fought against tyrants.

Yeah and they have lost many times through history. What is with your constant selective memory and bringing up vague facts like this while telling others to stay on topic.

Grade D tankie troll.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 58 points 11 months ago

While soldiers should be well informed and educated, it is insane to say that an army can rely on ad-hoc strategy and bottom up leadership. That might work for guerilla warfare tactics, but it does not create a coherent force in any other situation.

There should be civilian control of the military, but internally militaries require command hierarchy for the most significant decisions.

The president/parliament says we attack this country with these wargoals, the general says we attack this region, the commander says we attack this town, the officer says we attack this road, and I decide where to walk and what to shoot. There is no time to have a committee meeting about this and it is bad for opsec for every soldier to know where every other soldier is going.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

That might work for guerilla warfare tactics

Like the guerrilla used in Afghanistan by the talibans which proved successful in defeating the strongest army in the world?

[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 25 points 11 months ago

Which took 20 years after the country that fully occupied them decided to leave.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

You should always do the right thing regardless of how much time it takes.

If you want to compare these two wars i just discovered something i didn't know, it seem so far more people died in the russia-ukraine war that in the latest afghan war

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War#Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%932021)

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 22 points 11 months ago

The US wasn't conducting a genocidal war in Afghanistan. The Russian government is explicitly attempting to erase Ukraine as an entity and anyone who calls themselves Ukrainian with it.

[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

Sorry, what is the "right" thing here?

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

The right thing is fighting for freedom and not for authoritarian governments

[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah cool, so if you're ukrainiaU kill as many Russian soldiers as possible in the most organized and efficient way possible.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

The right thing would be for you to stop spreading all this false and cherry picked information. But here you are, running PR for Russia, who is clearly not doing the right thing.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Decentralized command is/was official doctrine in the Swedish military too. A single squadron in the woods, with a few fighter jets and a remote airstrip, is an independent entity in the Swedish military, intended to operate behind enemy lines, independent of the rest of the military.

However this only works for guerilla warfare, and Ukraine isn't at the point of insurgency yet. There is some partisan warfare in occupied Ukraine, but the majority of Ukraine's army is not behind enemy lines. It would be a lot harder for Ukraine to protect civilians and rearm if they downgraded to guerilla tactics.

Not to mention, comparing Afghanistan with Ukraine is such a nonsensical comparison. Russia is dedicating their entire army to Ukraine, and conscripting tens of thousands of soldiers. Russia loses more soldiers in a day than the US lost during the entire 20 year occupation.

Believe me, Russia would not have a fun time trying to occupy the entirety of Ukraine, and that's why they won't win this war. But the fact that Ukraine still has a coherent military has helped them defend their country, and helped preserve Ukraine from descending into complete chaos.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Stop talking about history like you know anything.

It was so effective because the US was pressured about collateral damage. Clearly Russia doesn't care about that. If we could have just bombed every single building in Afghanistan it would have been cake.

Jesus, you can't have a conversation without constantly misrepresenting things and ignoring obvious facts.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago
[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 32 points 11 months ago

I it's a tech bro trying to sell AI where the learning model is the Ukrainian people...

A few years ago this same guy tried to sell a blockchain weapons inventory system.

Before that crypto unlocked by biometrics just for soldiers so they can't lose their money.

Before that war "hover boards" for easier mobility and more speed through the fields.

Before that pet rocks so soldiers won't get lonely.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Did you read my comment? what is it not clear?

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago
[-] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

First open and read the article, there they talk about receiving "orders to invade russia"

Doesn't this make you rise an eyebrow?

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

…no

Do you not understand how an army works?

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

I guess i do. Do you not realize that receiving orders to invade another country is not a good thing?

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So you are against the Russian military invading Ukraine in 2014? And again in 2022? And Syria in 2015? And Georgia in 2008?

Russia can end the fighting just by leaving Ukrainian territory. You are "against war", so why not advocate for that?

Edit: just ignore this guy. His posts are mostly downvoted.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Russia can end the fighting just by leaving Ukrainian territory. You are “against war”, so why not advocate for that?

You are replying under a comment in which i said that receiving orders to invade another country is not a good thing. I'm advocating against other countries invasions, what exactly are you advocating for?

[-] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

The Russians should get the fuck out of Ukraine?

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Russians soldiers received orders to invade another country

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"Not a good thing?"

So when we invaded Germany in WW2, that was a bad thing. We shouldn't have done that? Jesus you are thick lol.

Let's just ignore context and nuance, just make sweeping statements like a 13 year old who thinks they've figured out the world.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Turnabout is fair play. Russia has no immediate intensions to stop the war, so Ukrainians took the fight to them.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

I see that the St Petersburg Research Centre is still thriving after Prigozhin's death.

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago

If that is true than how evil are the Russian soldiers for wanting to invade an innocent country and willfully kill their civilians?

[-] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

....and blocked.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Message for the downvoters since there's quite many: I don't wish anyone to experience the horrors of war, when it inevitably happens remember that you stood for it.

[-] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Russia did not give the Ukrainian people much alternative while they stole land, killed their friends and family and kept lying about it all. No one wishes for war, but you cannot appease a bully indefinitely.

[-] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

No one here stands for war. They stand for Ukraine defending itself, which you seem to have some strange issue with.

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

And I stood on the right side.

Going to war to kill evil invaders is not bad.

Invading an innocent country and killing their civilians is.

[-] Harvey656@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Sometimes people have no choice, war must happen at times. Until Russia, the ones who started and continue to perpetuate this war back out, then this war invasion is highly justified from a moral standpoint.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
410 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48564 readers
2014 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS