454

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/2f1VY

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I guess I'm lucky that I don't get bored easily because I can afford a house quite easily since I don't have to live somewhere "fun."

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 months ago

With "fun" do you mean places where there are jobs?

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Or maybe where their friends and family live? Where their kids have friends and support groups? Maybe where they've lived much of their life and don't want to leave?

The previous poster is just making shit up so they can cast shade. It's sad, really.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, my own lived experience of not needing or wanting things people desire in cities is clearly something I made up.

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I suspect you're just deflecting now as that's not what your comment communicated or suggested. You said they're making their decision to stay in Portland because they want to live somewhere fun, something that isn't even suggested in the article.

When you make a statement with no evidence to support it, it's often referred to as "making shit up". If you can cite a reference in the article that explicitly states that they're staying in Portland because they want "fun", I'll eat my words and issue a public apology (edit: as a post, not a comment, on .world for all to see.)

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

No, I said I'm glad I don't need the "fun" that people keep telling me is why people choose to live in cities. But if you want a citation, here's a quote from the article:

"We actually tried uprooting the kids to a more affordable town and found ourselves less happy in the end," Laura said.

So maybe not "fun" but definitely happiness, which is fun adjacent.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I work from home. Everywhere has a job.

But, no, these folks weren’t complaining about jobs. They were complaining about not having stuff to do.

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I work from home. Everywhere has a job.

Someone here clearly hasn't checked their privilege or even just thought about it.

But, no, these folks weren’t complaining about jobs. They were complaining about not having stuff to do.

If you actually read the article, you'll see this is also just made up.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I'm posting this in my underwear while getting paid. I know I have priviliege.

But so do the folks in the article:

When they're not at camp, she says, the kids stay home with her while she works remotely.

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

But so do the folks in the article (also have privilege):

And that is relevant to my comment how?

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Because you said I was privileged because I could work from home, but the woman in the article works from home. Why couldn't she do that in Spokane?

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Do you realize how hard you deflect or is your normal MO just a constant red herring fishing expedition?

I'm going to break this down in summary for the audience, then I'm disengaging to preserve my mental health.

You: these people just want to live in Portland because it's fun. They should move. Jobs are everywhere. I work from home.

Me: that's an awfully privileged thing to say (as in, jobs aren't everywhere for everyone and not everyone can work from home, including the electrician husband in the article).

You: The woman in the article is privileged too.

Me: what does that matter?

You: she could work from home like me.

Like any of that has any bearing on anything. You're just stretching hard to justify being judgmental and are cranking out bad faith arguments to support that.

[-] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Having things to do is important to some of us.

Also the fact that you work from home doesn't mean that you won't need to find another job later, and then your “stuff to do” might become a multi-hour commute to the new workplace.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I will never go back into an office and, thankfully, I have a role in an industry where they won't make me. And if they try I can always just go back to freelancing.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 3 months ago

I work from home don't assume I will be able to forever.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I've been fully remote for the last six years, through two jobs. Prior to that I was 80% remote for five years.

I will not be taking a job that forces me to be in an office, and I'm in a segment of my industry where WFH is going to stick around for a long time.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They sound like the kind of couple whose phones beep all day with social media bollocks because they can't bear to not feel a dopamine hit for ten seconds.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
454 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9781 readers
272 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS