Alt text: a destroyed city filled with speach bubbles all saying "stop your bombs" and Kamala Harris in the foreground with "I'm speaking" in large text along the bottom.
- No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
- No defending oppressive systems or organizations
- No uncivil or rude comments to other users
- Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
- No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.
These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.
There's nothing worse for leftism than leftists making bad arguments.
Calling for the end of genocide is a bad argument? Ok Liberal
Putting words into people's mouths, as you just did, and strawmanning, as the original meme does, are both bad arguments.
Opposing genocide is a good position. Let's not weaken our good positions with bad arguments.
Kamela Harris told pro-palestinian protesters at her own rally "I'm speaking" to silence them. This is a fact and not a strawman argument. If you want your comments to not be removed from this community for supporting genocidal entities, you'll need to explain where the strawman is in the OP meme.
Please, point out the strawman here. I responded already that "I'm speaking" were Kamela's exact words in response to recent pro-palestine protesters.
Why did she release an official statement condemning the people who protested Netanyahu's recent US visit? She could have said nothing at all, but chose to attack the very people who "refuse to remain silent" about the genocide. Why didn't she take the opportunity to agree with the protestors at her rally, and condemn the ongoing genocide and the ongoing US support and enablement of it?
"a full arms embargo would be untenable politically... to appease the pro-Israel members of the U.S electorate." Is support for genocide which is against rule 5 of this community.
We do not appease genocide supporters here.
The first link you posted is how she responded after the backlash from the events of the rally mentioned in your second link. That "meeting with leaders of the uncommitted movement" provided no actual results in terms of policy changes, only placating words.
The fact that no one "influential in either party" has called for an arms embargo does not invalidate our calls to an end to the genocide. If anything, it further proves the Democratic Party's support for the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people.
Until the immediate end of all military and financial support to Israel is a part of the Harris campaign's actual platform, it is absolutely not a strawman to attribute genocide support to her.