60
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spookex@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah nah, fuck copyright, we should be making it weaker and not stronger

[-] jaschop@awful.systems 10 points 4 months ago

This isn't a copyright thing. This is a tech regulation thing, that creates the possibility for data protection agencies to stick their noses in AI company's business.

[-] spookex@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

General purpose” mostly means LLMs. Companies have a year to write documentation and promise to follow copyright.

Says it right there

[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago

how does allowing the ai companies to ignore copyright improve the situation, pray tell?

[-] Architeuthis@awful.systems 8 points 4 months ago

Next time Lars Ulrich sues you you'll be able to say you needed the Some Kind of Monster mp3s for AI research. It's foolproof.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1494 readers
51 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS