I've literally integrated LLMs into a materials optimizations routine at Apple. It's dangerous to assume what strangers do and do not know.
All the technologies you listed behave deterministically, or at least predictably enough that we generally don't have to worry about surprises from that abstraction layer. Technology does not just move on, practitioners need to actually find it practical beyond their next project that satisfies the shareholders.
Oh, he offered to show them identification but they wouldn't let him.
People said the same of Sadam. Trust me, more imperialism can make it worse.
Totally her fault for not buying stock and instead decide to have kids she could not afford. But really her husband should be to blame for not making more money. Could he not get a job at ICE? /s
The part about robots doing backflips causes the robot to wear down faster has me thinking the whole "replace humans with humanoids" should be framed as comparative advantage rather than how many robots would be required to build itself. Given the number of humanoids required to replicate itself, you could take those same complex parts, rearrange them into non-humanoid configurations and have more output both in an interval of time and over the life time of those parts.
We just took one of their toys: an oil tanker.
Okay, Marge Simpson
Establishing a hegemon can only be done after the revolution. Once you eat that pill there's no perfection afterwards without some self-destruction.
I love Micheal Parenti but that quote doesn't address the criticism. Parenti talks of revolution, OP talks of a government preserving the status quote.
Luigi is more popular than Congress right now.
Your description of the tools was to make an inaccurate comparison. But sure, I am the "dangerous" one for showing how those examples are deterministic while gAI is not. Your responses with personal attacks makes it harder to address your claims and makes me think you are here to convince yourself and not others.