[-] vivendi@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, them not saying anything why they support that hiterlite scum is quite concerning. I think the CEO is just mad he got caught trying to startup a Nazi bar

[-] vivendi@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

Ah but you see, you have to understand the FOSS community a little more than just "using a license that FSF and OSI endorsed".

In terms of inter-project politics, systemd is almost wholly owned by IBM. They can override any will they want, they can change anything they want, all while fucking the community over. In short, IBM, using systemd as a massive octopus growing it's tentacles all over mainstream Linux distros, is gaining considerable weight to pull in the Linux world.

They can essentially dictate matters to everyone they want, because you don't want your distro to stop being supported, do you? And now, another IBM-majority project, GNOME, is almost dependent on systemd (despite the very good word of both gnome and systemd that this wouldn't happen, IT HAS) and KDE is also being slowly pulled in that direction, with DrKonqi becoming systemd only in it's latest update.

Essentially, we are handing over 30 years of work in FOSS to IBM, literally the caricature of evil tech company, and now they control the mainstream and can dictate their will.

Allow me to remind you that this same IBM almost immediately after taking over RedHat, started closing down the source sharing of RHEL, which is it's own whole thing so I digress.

Let my final word be this, R.M.S as much of a problematic piece of shit he is, correctly predicted we being fucked over by DRM and subscription services 20 years ago and was ridiculed for it.

Don't you think it's time to take a fucking hint? You don't have to be an anarchist to see where this is going.

[-] vivendi@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

You do realize that it's not a binary between systemd and SysV, right? There are modern replacements for SysV other than systemd, like dinit, OpenRC, s6 and they all strive to address the shortcomings of SysV

[-] vivendi@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

To be fair, LLM technology is really making other fields obsolete. Nobody is going to bother making yet another shitty CNN, GRU, LSTM or something when we have transformer architecture, and LLMs that do not work with text (like large vision models) are looking like the future

[-] vivendi@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Nah Lemmy in particular is a worse dump than Miyazaki's poison swamps. The level of zeal on lemmy is staggering (I mean, it's already resulted in one terrorist attack)

I feel like this is because it's much smaller than alternatives. It starts to feel like you're circlejerking the same dicks every day.

[-] vivendi@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

A battery

A highly complex system with support systems to prevent it from literally blowing up (mmmmm tasty lithium)

A battery management system

A seriously complex piece of model specific code that is usually proprietary and has hardware level bricking fuses (so fuck you if it has a fault)

And also, all the other management shit like regen braking and what have you.

You're doing a "reduction". If you reduce literally anything to such high abstraction it seems simple. Yes, quantum physics is also " just " an observation of a continuous system, nothing to it mate

ICE cars can be completely reassembled with a couple of wrenches. The most proprietary thing in the whole system is the ECU, and you can swap that and whatever if you wish to do so.

[-] vivendi@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

90% of your power train is proprietary electronics that are designed to be opaque and break of you try and "tamper" with them

Most of an ICE car is tangible, rather widely replicable, blocks of metallic alloys

[-] vivendi@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

How tf did canon brick them

My shit is so ancient it has no idea what an "Internet" is. I'd like to see canon touch this mfer lol

[-] vivendi@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

This is because auto regressive LLMs work on high level "Tokens". There are LLM experiments which can access byte information, to correctly answer such questions.

Also, they don't want to support you omegalul do you really think call centers are hired to give a fuck about you? this is intentional

[-] vivendi@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

You need to run the model yourself and heavily tune the inference, which is why you haven't heard from it because most people think using shitGPT is all there is with LLMs. How many people even have the hardware to do so anyway?

I run my own local models with my own inference, which really helps. There are online communities you can join (won't link bcz Reddit) where you can learn how to do it too, no need to take my word for it

view more: ‹ prev next ›

vivendi

joined 8 months ago