[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago

It does help greatly in general though, because all of your data will be encrypted when the device is at rest. Theft and B&Es will no longer present a risk to your privacy.

Per-app permissions address this specific threat model directly. Containerized apps, such as those provided by Flatpak can ensure that apps remain sandboxed and unable to access data without explicit authorization.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 months ago

I'm happy to see it's finally happening, and I hope they left its implementation flexible.

What I'd really love to see (aside from triple buffer) is a real solution to the system tray situation. AppIndicator is problematic for some apps and under certain X11/Wayland desktops, and even when it works well it is cumbersome to use compared to traditional tray implementations. Hoping we see a new approach soon.

In the meantime, I've been enjoying a revisit to KDE Plasma under Kinoite and I have to say I'm really impressed with both DEs!

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If a layman may ask, what are folks even using AI/LLMs for mostly? Aside from playing around with some for 10-15 mins out of simple curiosity, I don't have a practical use for platforms like ChatGPT. I'm just wondering what the average tech enthusiast uses these for, outside of academia.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 18 points 6 months ago

Yep. My only real goal is to reduce the amount of advertising I'm exposed to on a daily basis, and to that end it's working...for now.

No cable, no streaming services, no broadcast radio, automated downloads of media, ad blockers everywhere, DNS sinkhole, etc. Thankfully, it's all low maintenance once in place.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 23 points 7 months ago

Ubuntu is (mostly) based on Debian. This is simply a move by Ubuntu to further push their own packaging platform which is effectively proprietary at this time. Debian's own packaging will remain unchanged.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 18 points 9 months ago

I appreciate the writeup and that you've taken the time to post about it here, however I am 100% leery of managing remote access or credentials using closed source software. I'll definitely keep an eye on the project, but it's a hard pass for me until the app is fully open source.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago

I can't deny that the name's connotation in internet culture is what turned me away from Fedora for many, many years. It is an unfortunate coincidence.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

You haven't really identified any of your reasons for leaving the previous distros behind. Did they fall short somewhere? If it was simply to try them all out, then by all means, add a notch on your belt for Arch too. You can always install yet another distro down the road if it doesn't pan out.

I'm a former Arch dev, and once upon a time I created its logo. I love the project, and it will always be dear to me. That said, I use Fedora Silverblue for most of my host systems now, and Arch containers for my everyday tasks.

As you likely already know, Fedora provides one of the best GNOME experiences available. I like the additional stability, flexibility, background updates, and easy rollbacks that Silverblue provides, but I can also appreciate that the flatpak and containerized workflow isn't for everyone.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Nope, we love our local library for nearly all of our media needs!

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

I don't use self-checkouts in retail stores, and I hate that some stores, like Shoppers, will try so hard to direct me to one when I'm in the queue for the cashier. I have put down merch and walked out of stores over this stance, and I no longer visit some stores (like Shoppers).

I'm not entirely against automated purchase systems. A completely touchless system would get a pass from me. I am against retailers forcing their customers to manually scan and check-out their products though, all while treating them as untrustworthy by dictating where they can place their scanned merch, weighing the merch as it's scanned, and checking the receipts after doing so.

Obviously, none of this addresses the question of whether fully-automated retail spaces are actually good for the working class as a whole.

9
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by thayer@lemmy.ca to c/jerboa@lemmy.ml

If Jerboa is the official mobile app for Lemmy, why not simply call it Lemmy, or Lemmy Mobile, or Lemmy for Android? It seems more practical to make use of the official platform name, branding and trademark.

Edit: Thanks everyone for the correction, I was under the impression that Jerboa was the official app because it's made by one of the two core Lemmy devs.

4
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by thayer@lemmy.ca to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml

I'm hoping to start a dialogue about the current use of descriptive community names, usernames, lack of semantic URLs, and other usability issues on the Lemmy platform. I say dialogue because I am new to Lemmy and I can appreciate that some things may be done differently here for specific reasons.

This is not my sandbox but I'd like to see a castle here someday nonetheless, and I'm willing to help make that happen if there's an appetite to see these core issues addressed:

1. Community display names

Community display names should not be used in any meaningful way on the platform. They should not be displayed in the feeds, nor in community search results. Personally, I don't think they should be used anywhere except as a byline on the community's feed.

These descriptive names are not unique and it is trivial for anyone to create a community and change its display name to match that of another on the same instance. This clone will appear right alongside the legitimate community in search results, page feeds, and even moderator lists (such as those viewed on profile pages).

Many community display names are so long that they are truncated when viewed in mobile apps, adding to the ambiguity.

It is also impossible to know the actual community name until a link is hovered over (impossible on mobile) or actually visited (potentially dangerous).

2. User display names

Similar to community names, these descriptive names should not be used in any meaningful way on the platform. There is nothing to stop me from changing my display name to that of a site admin, moderator, or user, and then creating posts under the guise of that person. Again, there is no way of knowing the actual username without hovering over the link (impossible on mobile), or visiting the user's profile directly.

Another side effect of showing display names in the feed is that some usernames appear as single emoji or with emojis in their name, which is distracting at best and annoying at worst.

In my opinion, display names should be restricted to a user's profile page, similar to how GitHub implements usernames and full names. Post feeds, search results, and any other meaningful place should display the unique username only.

3. Semantic (clean) URLs

A GitHub issue discussing cleaner URLs has been open since July 2020, which leads me to believe this isn't a priority. I won't list the many reasons why user-friendly, SEO-friendly post slugs are important today, as Wikipedia already has it covered (and with a clean URL). The merits of clean URLs have been written about extensively for more than a decade. The bottom line is that this:

https://lemmy.ml/lemmy_support/72hsHD/qol_usability_concerns

...or even this:

https://lemmy.ml/lemmy_support/1043897

...reveals a lot more about a link before I click it than this:

https://lemmy.ml/post/1043897

It helps to understand the link destination before you click it, and this is an issue that will only get messier if left unaddressed for too long.

4. Sanitized post titles

Last week, I noticed that users are able to include markdown in their post titles, allowing for `code` syntax highlighting in the title itself. This is a bad practice, prone to abuse in the long run as some users will increasingly try to draw attention to their posts.

5. Link posts don't link to the link

I fully appreciate that Lemmy isn't trying to be a Reddit clone but as a link aggregator platform, I'm surprised that link posts do not actually link to the submitted hyperlink. This contradicts not only Reddit, but other link aggregator services, including Hacker News and Lobsters. Currently, the user has to know to click the thumbnail instead of the post title, or enter into the post and then click the title a second time to visit the submitted link. This is just not intuitive.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

As I understand it, the community would simply carry on without a mod, until such a time that the site admin appointed a new mod. The content would remain, and other users would still be able to post to it etc.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

...And only your own upvote. Reddit, you disappoint me more often than not. Welcome aboard!

33
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by thayer@lemmy.ca to c/main@lemmy.ca

Update: @smorks@lemmy.ca has been kind enough to add Rediggit as a native theme to the lemmy.ca instance. You can now access it from your account settings page, without the need of another browser add-on.

Just posting an update on my Rediggit theme, in case anyone else prefers a reddit/digg-style interface for the desktop.

Highlights include:

  • Flexible full-width layout, with fixed width for vote buttons and thumbnail columns
  • Strong focus on content and discussion (improved comment legibility)
  • Decreased font size throughout
  • Increased post list density
  • No user or community circle-icons
  • No community banners or logos
  • Few rounded buttons or boxes
  • Re-sizable comment box
view more: ‹ prev next ›

thayer

joined 1 year ago