[-] tanja 26 points 1 month ago

Wake up babe, new bottom surgery just dropped

[-] tanja 34 points 4 months ago

Both.

Both is good.

[-] tanja 37 points 5 months ago

I like the intention, but I'm worried about the advice near the end

Learn to see things that aren't "leftist" as radical.

I.e. a whole bunch of settle for less

I want leftist spaces, groups, what have you without tankies, not community centers who dislike the current government.

Am I missing something? I'm new to this 🥺

[-] tanja 31 points 8 months ago

No nooooo cyclist bad 😔😿😔

Just one more lane pls 🥺👉👈

Car-brain go brrrr

[-] tanja 37 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't think they're allowed to do these fake loading screens in the EU

PS: in the settings of uBlock Origin, you can select a cookie banner blocker. This gets rid of 99.99% of cookie banners ✨ (there're also options against newsletter boxes).
9 of 10 hacker kittens recommend this 🌸😸

[-] tanja 27 points 9 months ago

Good meme, but keep in mind Elmo (Mr. X) has 3 jets and she only one.

Also: Where's the public transit 🥺

[-] tanja 24 points 9 months ago

Benutzername prüft aus

[-] tanja 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Could've worked on tackling climate change, inflation, homelessness, (some form of) European style health care, labour rights, or expand public transit, but they choose to discriminate against transgender people for zero gain.

Why are the United States so wird?

And how do you even enforce such a law effectively?
Many people have very good passing, and there have already been (self video-) recorded cases of cisgender people getting "accused" of being trans by some transphobe.

No one even wants these laws, at least most people don't.

And why is the headline so non-judgemental? "Regulates" isn't a good fit for tyranny imo.

[-] tanja 28 points 11 months ago

Babe, wake up

High quality 196 content just dropped 🏳️‍🌈

[-] tanja 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Just because these people can't vote yet doesn't mean they shouldn't have rights or be treated with dignity and respect like the rest of society.

I'm disappointed with people arguing that literally banning smartphones would somehow improve the social situation for anyone.

Just because you cannot see bullying or collect statistics about it quite as easily, does not mean it disappears. I'd argue the opposite: blocking others online is trivial compared to doing the same in-person.

We also have to acknowledge that some children simply are more introverted, and will want to stay more secluded than others. Forcing them to behave in other ways seems counterproductive.

Just because some parents (understandably) struggle with raising their kids shouldn't mean that they're all doomed to what amounts to nationwide collective punishment.

I for one support children's rights, at least on this one point.

Edit:
Exact circumstances can, and will very, as every child is unique. Therefore, we should allow for case by case decisions. Luckily, the de facto situation already has the parents deciding, which makes sense in most cases IMO.

And taking away the phones of other people won't stop online bullying either (e.g. spreading rumors without the victim's knowledge).

[-] tanja 40 points 1 year ago

Common 196 W

[-] tanja 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, you (and anyone else) can block it for themselves.

Blocking communities you don't want to see our interact with is a native feature of Lemmy.

It's a left-leanig LGBTIQ+-inclusive shitposting community.
It migrated from Reddit r/196, tho I think the memes there were better.

Personally, I like it 💖

view more: ‹ prev next ›

tanja

joined 1 year ago