OOMs happen because your system is out of memory.
You asked how to know which process is responsible. There is no correct answer to which process is "wrong" in using more memory
all one can say is that processes are in aggregate asking for too much memory. The kernel tries to "blame" a process and will kill it, as you've seen, to let your system continue to function, but ultimately, you may know better than it which is acting in a way you don't want.
It should log something to the kernel log when it OOM kills something.
It may be that you simply don't have enough memory to do what you want to do. You could take a glance in top
(sort by memory usage with shift-M). You might be able to get by by adding more paging (swap) space. You can do this with a paging file if it's problematic to create a paging partition.
EDIT: I don't know if there's a way to get a dump of processes that are using memory at exactly the instant of the OOM, but if you want to get an idea of what memory usage looks at at that time, you can certainly do something like leave a top -o %MEM -b >log.txt
process running to get a snapshot every two seconds of process memory use. top
will print a timestamp at the top of each entry, and between the timestamped OOM entry in the kernel log and the timestamped dump, you should be able to look at what's using memory.
There are also various other packages for logging resource usage that provide less information, but also don't use so much space, if you want to view historical resource usage. sysstat is what I usually use, with the sar
command to view logged data, though that's very elderly. Things like that won't dump a list of all processes, but they will let you know if, over a given period of time, a server is running low on available memory.
I'm the other way. I'd rather have battery life on cell phones, and turn the refresh rate down.
On a desktop, where the power usage is basically irrelevant, then sure, I'll crank the refresh rate way up. One of the most-immediately-noticeable things is the mouse pointer, and that doesn't exist on touch interfaces.
Fallout:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG3uBgQmTnk
System Shock:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tKIJUxSyaU
System Shock 2:
I had always assumed that "Maxwell House" referred to "House" in the "household" sense of the word rather than "physical building".
Apparently, though, it refers to a large hotel that was named "house" from the get-go.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell_House_Hotel
The Maxwell House Hotel was a major hotel in downtown Nashville. Because of its stature, seven US Presidents and other prominent guests stayed there over the years. It was built by Colonel John Overton Jr. and named for his wife, Harriet (Maxwell) Overton. The architect was Isaiah Rogers.[1]
Not a video game, but since I try to reference relevant Threadiverse communities when I can, if you're not aware of it, you might enjoy !militarymoe@ani.social.
AI art isn’t theft, so the rest of your question falls apart.
While I don't disagree, I think that OP can make a valid point in that a number of users here do very loudly object to AI-generated art but don't object in the same way to posting copyrighted content itself.
Note that this is Jane Goodall (a famous researcher on chimpanzees, who studied a troupe in Africa for some time). Relevant:
https://files.catbox.moe/1h368p.jpg
This sparked a controversy:
https://www.cbr.com/far-side-jane-goodall-gary-larson-feud/
Okay, in August 1987, Larson did a strip where the punchline involved Goodall. The strip drew the following letter to the editor at the Arizona Daily Star...
To the editor:
I was appalled when I saw Gary Larson's "The Far Side" cartoon in the Star Aug. 26. This was of two Larson animals - presumably chimpanzees - in a tree. One, which was evidently supposed to be the female, was picking a long hair from the other's shoulder. The caption read: "Well, well - another blond hair...Conducting a little more 'research' with that Jane Goodall tramp?"
To refer to Dr. Goodall as a tramp is inexcusable - even by a self-described "loony" as Larson. The cartoon was incredibly offensive and in such poor taste that readers might well question the editorial judgment of running such an atrocity in a newspaper that reputes to be supplying the news to persons with a better than average intelligence. The cartoon and its message were absolutely stupid.
Dr. Goodall is a world-renowned scientist who has devoted 28 years of her life to studying chimpanzees in the wild. Her findings have caused the scientific world to redefine the meaning of the word "mankind" with her discoveries that include the erroneous presumption that man was the only primate to make and use tools, a distinction that - until her findings disproved it - been a measure of superiority of human beings over other primates.
With no alignment to any animal welfare group, Dr. Goodall is working very hard to instigate better treatment of chimpanzees in biomedical laboratories. Dr. Goodall has vowed to speak out for those animals that cannot speak for themselves.
"Tramp?" Hardly.
The irresponsibility of the Star in choosing to run such an obscenity is disgusting. In fact, any woman should be insulted by the reference that the female - in this case, a typical Larson eyeglass-wearing animal - would be unaware of what Dr. Goodall's research really is, its seriousness and the assumption that a female only would have the mentality to look for sexual implications.
Sue Engel
Executive Director
The Jane Goodall Institute
Yikes, so I guess Larson really offended Goodall, huh? Well, not so fast...
Goodall hadn't actually seen the strip herself, and when she DID see it, she thought it was funny. She didn't think it was ACTUALLY calling her a tramp (and that's clearly not the implication of the strip). She would later write an introduction to one of Larson's Far Side collections.
Going further, she even licensed the strip for shirts that were sold at The Jane Goodall Institute for years!
EDIT: Ah, I just discovered that someone else just posted this in another post on !thefarside@sh.itjust.works, and I assume that merde
being merde
probably posted this image in response, so I'm probably working backwards here, but I'll leave it up.
goes to Steam, searches for items with tags "Anime", "Singleplayer", and "Shooter", type "Game" to exclude bundles, sorts by "User Reviews"
295 results match your search. 97 titles have been excluded based on your preferences.
That's not logged in, so I assume that the 97 probably have adult content or something that Valve defaults to not showing, so figure ~400 games.
EDIT: It looks like "Shooter" can also mean stuff like shmups or rail shooters. You may be interested in that, but if not, replacing the "Shooter" tag with the "FPS" (first-person shooter) tag:
Or the "Third-person shooter" tag:
EDIT2: Apparently and obnoxiously, Valve didn't make search URL links compatible between the mobile version of the site and the desktop version of the site. The above was from a desktop browser. But if you're on mobile, you can probably recreate the search by adding the same tags.
Omega Boost
Street Fighter x Tekken
Colony Wars: Vengeance
Xenogears
Starsiege
Quake 3 Arena