>50 min read  
>”why company has perverse incentives”
>no mention of capitalism

rationalism.mpeg

Are these entry-level developers that are merely half as good as expert human unassisted developers in the room with us right now?

you all joke, but my mind is so expanded by stimulants that I, and only I, can see how this dogshit code will one day purchase all the car manufacturers and build murderbots

Good hustle Gerard, great job starting this chudstorm. I’m having a great time

You didn't link to the study; you linked to the PR release for the study. This and this are the papers linked in the blog post.

Note that the papers haven't been published anywhere other than on Anthropic's online journal. Also, what the papers are doing is essentially tea leaf reading. They take a look at the swill of tokens, point at some clusters, and say, "there's a dog!" or "that's a bird!" or "bitcoin is going up this year!". It's all rubbish dawg

“Hello, peasants, I come to deliver you from ignorance. I can tell just by looking at your filthy clothes and vacant gazes that you all misuse the term AI. It is my obligation and privilege to educate you and inform you of the bright future AI is soon to bring, you swine.”

That’s you

Kicking off the sack with something light.

App that is plagued by bot accounts thinks that adding more bot-nature will improve quality

I have found a way to solve world hunger with a fork bomb

just one more manifesto bro, just one more and we'll get an unregulated free market, just one more bro

Also, billing David Gerard as "the Forrest Gump of the internet" in a tweet and not mentioning that you can plausibly blame him for the whole Musk X Grimes collab is a true fumble

I can imagine a comedian using an LLM to check if a joke or punchline has been done before, but that would require the LLM to actually work and give accurate information. Also if you are a comedian using an LLM, you probably don’t actually care about whether or not you are plagiarising someone, so I guess this is all moot.