I have to be honest, this looks like something that ChatGPT came up with. Although if it wasn't, don't take it as an insult. ChatGPT writes well, but I feel it's output lacks the substance a human can create. Also, I'm picky. xD
I'll admit, I haven't read Stalin theory. And while this is well written, I don't think a leader from the people, for the people, would hardly take himself in such high regard. As in, this text makes him seem like an egocentric. When he was just like you and me, part of the proletariat. Albeit with more theoretical knowledge and in circumstances that gave him the opportunity for leadership.
If I were to recreate this, I'd honestly just ask ChatGPT to write a Tinder profile for a member of the proletariat.
He may have been a great Leader, but the future is now on our generations hands, and we have to realize we, each one of us, is important. And to have pride on our own Tinder profiles, instead of idolizing what was in the past. I think a text which lifts up the spirit of the common man, instead if idolizing someone from the past, would be cooler. :)
Idk why you're down voted, I think you're right. Also aren't tankies part of the left, leftist infighting aside?
Edit: To clarify, giving them a word that makes leftist infighting seem silly seems, pointless. The only people on the left I know of that use the word tankie literally don't even try to understand the other side. It's not taking a word away from them that's going to stop it. It's by approaching every conversation with humility, and explaining them the theory they so clearly lack. If even so they think you're wrong (and bring arguments, ofc), and you can't defend using theory, then maybe they're right? I don't understand, isn't this the point of the whole reading part everyone agrees we should do?