[-] paris 18 points 6 months ago
[-] paris 20 points 11 months ago

The only thing more pointless is our PERFECTLY SPHERICAL ORBS, NOW HALF OFF IF YOU BUY TWO! BUT WAIT, THERES MORE! IF YOU CALL THE NUMBER ON YOUR SCREEN NOW, WE'LL THROW IN A LIMITED EDITION BONUS STAND TO HOLD YOUR ORB! THATS RIGHT, IF YOU CALL NOW YOU WILL GET TWO ORBS AND TWO STANDS FOR THE PRICE OF JUST ONE! CALL 1-800-PONDER AND ORDER YOUR TWO PONDERING ORBS FOR THE PRICE OF ONE!

disclaimer perfectly spherical pondering orb incorporated does not guarantee increased ponderance, seer abilities, or supernatural powers. perfectly spherical pondering orbs are only fda approved for looking at to ponder. do not look at the sun through perfectly spherical pondering orb. do not drop perfectly spherical pondering orb. do not leave perfectly spherical pondering orb in reach of a child. this ad is brought to you by raid shadow legends.

[-] paris 17 points 11 months ago

It varies by person. Some use the word parent, some use mom or dad or both.

[-] paris 16 points 11 months ago

This most recent ruling wildly expanded the immunity, added presumed immunity for adjacent actions, and phrased everything in such a way that actually prosecuting the president for literally anything will take years.

Say the president does something you think is illegal and should be prosecuted. Stop. Before you can take him to court over that, you need to determine if what he did was "official" or "unofficial." SCOTUS didn't give deterministic guidelines to differentiate, so you need to have a separate court case just for that. Alright so let's have the court case that determines whether what the president did was official or unofficial. Let's introduce some evidence—

Stop. Evidence from official acts cannot be introduced in a case to prove something was unofficial. So you actually need to have a separate court case to determine if that evidence is official or unofficial. Once you have your results, one party won't like it and will appeal it up and up to the supreme court. Repeat for potentially every single piece of evidence.

Okay now that we know what evidence we can and can't introduce, we can finally determine if what the president did was official or unofficial. Once we have a result, one party won't like it and it will be appealed all the way up to the supreme court again. Only when SCOTUS rules the action was unofficial (IF they rule it was unofficial) can you then BEGIN the process of actually taking the president to court over that action.

This will take years, not to mention the supreme court is appointed by the president and it recently ruled that taking bribes after you do something instead of before is perfectly legal actually. This is all by design. The point is to keep this all tied up in court for years, which effectively gives the president full immunity for everything. And he can also pressure the courts or judges to rule his way via any number of threats (if you think that's an unofficial act, feel free to take him to court over it).

This is pretty clearly designed to functionally protect the president from all culpability (which the dissenting SCOTUS opinions agree on, ergo their dissent).

[-] paris 20 points 1 year ago

According to available information that I've come across, everything is processed on-device and encrypted and 25gb can store months of rewind data depending on how much and how you use your device. At that rate, a terabyte should store about a decade of history (I can't think of anything you would need to go that far back for though).

If security researchers don't find sussy behavior where Recall sends back some sort of data beyond basic telemetry, there's not really any higher of a privacy risk compared to using your computer as you currently do. Also you can disable it for certain applications and delete history when you want to (or disable the feature altogether). People are being really weird about this for reasons that have already been addressed.

[-] paris 17 points 1 year ago

WHY IS HE SO BIG

[-] paris 17 points 1 year ago

Btw the term to describe that type of person is "tankie." They're ostensibly leftists, but in reality support all manner of authoritarian and genocidal leaders and groups.

Their foundational principle is generally "America and its allies bad, American enemies good" and almost all of their political positions are developed from that foundation.

Since tankies often don't like being called tankies, the more historically used term "campist" encompasses that "america vs everyone else" mentality. Campism is dumb and tankies end up fighting against the democratic movements they claim to support.

[-] paris 18 points 2 years ago

Why not use a reverse proxy to keep everything on port 443 behind your own domain or duckdns? /gen

[-] paris 20 points 2 years ago

I understand the frustration in watching him waltz around unfazed after what he did, but we've never had to apply this law before. We need to get this right the first time. We can't afford to fuck up applying this law, and not fucking it up takes time.

[-] paris 19 points 2 years ago

For anyone wondering, their account was created two days ago and half of their handful of comments are like this. That person is baiting. Just report, block, and move on.

[-] paris 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Updated again to more than 800. Jesus…

[-] paris 20 points 2 years ago

YouTube makes money by showing ads on videos people watch. If they show people the videos they want to watch, they get to show more ads before someone stops watching YouTube for the day. This incentives YouTube to surface the videos that people will watch for the longest time with no regard for anything but their advertisers' willingness to have their ads played on said videos.

Also it's expensive to moderate a platform so big that one in three humans uses it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

paris

joined 2 years ago