[-] lukstru@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

It's not too late, we can still burn it down.

[-] lukstru@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

NaN: „Hey Nanna, can you call the nanny?“

[-] lukstru@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I was hoping for a \end{meme} in the text description 😢

[-] lukstru@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I get that it's annoying to have a lot of (obviously) under qualified applications, and someone has to go through them. I just don't think it's possible to solve this problem without being unfair to at least some applicants.

More contextI was part of a hiring committee for a professor job at an European university last year. The job description was clear enough that you got the vibe "this is a high profile job. Only apply if you think you really are high profile for a European university."

And we got soooo many trash applications, we rejected more than 90% in the first screening. Some obvious ones, and some less obvious ones. The obvious ones were the most annoying, because wtf is that application. One that will always stay in my mind is the application of an already established professor, which consisted only of a CV that looked like a 3 year old glued it together and someone replicated that in Power Point in 2003. I was so confused about this application, because how tf did this person think this was enough? They're an established professor! They really should know how applications work.

So yeah, I get that there are a lot of annoying applications coming in that feel like a waste of time for everyone. Asking money to apply will not help tho.

Maybe hire someone to help with the applications..? No wait, then you'd have to go through even more applications. /s

17
submitted 1 month ago by lukstru@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
12

For our parkour group, we have a list of spots with custom pictures of the spots, embedded right into google maps, so you don’t have to click on any other website. This is quite cool and convenient. Is there any way to move that list (manually is ok) to OSM? E.g. in a city guides functionality, which I have some memory of, but don’t know where it comes from.

[-] lukstru@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

More devices? Less performance requirements for updating? More tested code? Awesome!

[-] lukstru@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Tbh I don’t care about the sponsor segments in videos. It’s actually my favorite way of advertising, as I can skip it or watch the funny ones (tomska does really funny - although slightly incorrect - segments).

But boy do I hate sponsored results on Amazon or similar platforms. I feel like I have to search through them to get to the actual products, and then I can’t trust the reviews

237
rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by lukstru@lemmy.world to c/196
81
submitted 1 month ago by lukstru@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
[-] lukstru@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sugar increases the risk of health complications, therefore selling products containing added sugar is assault

84
Sunset Surf (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by lukstru@lemmy.world to c/pics@lemmy.world
92
Carcans Plage [OC] (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by lukstru@lemmy.world to c/pics@lemmy.world
[-] lukstru@lemmy.world 81 points 2 months ago

I recently held a science slam about this topic! It's a mix of the first computer scientists being mathematicians, who love their abbreviations, and limited screen size, memory and file size. It's a trend in computing that has been well justified in the past, but has been making it harder for people to work together. And the need to use abbreviations has completely gone with the age of auto completion and language servers.

4

26
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by lukstru@lemmy.world to c/spiders@lemmy.world

shared from: https://lemmy.world/post/18665706

Ignore the dirty window lol. Had them in our house for over a week in that spot now, but this is the first time they turned around. I find the legs mesmerizing

6

shared from: https://lemmy.world/post/18665706

Ignore the dirty window lol. Had them in our house for over a week in that spot now, but this is the first time they turned around. I find the legs mesmerizing

70
submitted 3 months ago by lukstru@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Ignore the dirty window lol. Had them in our house for over a week in that spot now, but this is the first time they turned around. I find the legs mesmerizing

325
I’m that bench (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by lukstru@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
36
submitted 4 months ago by lukstru@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Hi! I rarely see photos that look good by introducing (either a lot or just a little) tilt. Granted, I don’t look at a lot of professional photos, and I’m more talking about typical amateur photos. So my question is: is there a situation where introducing tilt is beneficial? Or am I right in my intuition to just avoid tilt when taking photos?

view more: next ›

lukstru

joined 4 months ago