Rules for thee, but not for me.
Maybe if you actually bothered to read the articles I linked, you'd see there are plenty of verifiable sources for the statements they make.
We just blindly trust the accuracy of OP, who didn't even bother to link to an article, yet discredit any suggestion that there might be bias at work in HRW because it's not widely covered by western controlled liberal media.
HRW is just an organization trying to establish casus belli for western imperialism.
The same Human Rights Watch with close ties to the US government who would certainly never post misleading stories about the US's enemies?
I watched a few seconds out of morbid curiosity.
It's bad. Really bad. Tasteless and soulless. That is my honest review.
Good to know, I'll send them your way if I see any.
Cute, but not enough, not by a mile. Calling Piefed "left-leaning" is a LARP at best.
You’re treating these neoliberal interpretations of bias as some sort of intellectual debate to "inform" folks, instead of the existential threat it is to the nature of online discourse.
Sure, left-wing discussions are "allowed" as long as they wear their scarlet letter and stay in the ghetto where we put them.
I spent 3? years studying right wing disinformation
Guess some of it rubbed off.
Quokk.au is a left-leaning instance? Never got that impression. I feel like I've seen as many Israel-simping zionists from there as on .world.
If Europe won't do anything about Putin, they for sure won't do anything about Trump. Spineless, all of them.
Tell that to Orban
They're still a right-wing party, not much different from Orban, just now in the pockets of the EU.
Their entire platform is the lack of a platform, which basically means "our beliefs are for sale."
If Shen wants to come out as trans, that's great. But I think it's inappropriate to be making assumptions based only on vibes until then.
Trying to preempt someone's egg cracking is either misgendering or goading someone to out themselves before they're ready.