[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

A key for each service for each device is too impractical in real life.

Getting a new device would mean logging in to hundreds of services to link up the new device. Or somehow keep track of which services have keys with which devices. And signing up to a new service would mean having to remember to generate keys for a a handfull of devices, some of which might not be available at the time (like a desktop computer at home when you are out). Or you risk getting logged out if you loose the one device that had a key for that particular service.

I agree passkeys can make sense with something like BitWarden or KeyPassX. Something that is FOSS, and is OS and device agnostic, and let's you sync keys across devices. And should have independent backups too. Sync is not backup.

[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I use BitWarden too. OS , device and browser agnostic is a win

But I imagine the vast amount of people will use whatever their platform is pushing, so Apple Google or Microsoft. And in 5 years time "3rd party passkeys" are not "secure enough" and blocked by the OS. (Ok that's a bit tinfoil hat, but Google's recent Android app developer verification scheme is fresh in mind)

[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 114 points 3 weeks ago

The biggest disadvantage:

Disadvantages of Passkeys

Ecosystem Lock-In – Passkey pairs are synced through each vendor’s respective clouds via end-to-end encryption to facilitate seamless access multiple devices.

More eggs in the American megacorp basket for more people, yay

[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Probably youtube is just a bad example in this case. But javascript heavy pages were regular SaveAs doesn't really work definitely exist, and the value is in preserving those websites information and formatting

[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Space Engineers have a guide for that: Splitsie's guide on building interesting spaceships

[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 71 points 8 months ago

Tech dirt's stepping up and arguing for actual journalism:

Let’s be clear: uncritically reporting the White House’s “nothing to see here” stance isn’t journalism — it’s stenography.

The media’s job isn’t to parrot White House talking points — it’s to uncover the truth.

[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago
[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

From the article:

In a statement, the police in Finland said the authorities had boarded the Eagle S tanker in Finnish waters.

So no international waters in this case. In fact there are no international waters in the Baltic Sea ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_waters )

[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

It's hard to write and hard to read. The forced joining of every single letter in a word quicky makes it unintelligible unless your handwriting is perfect or you write very slowly

[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Flashback to ~2008-2009 when all laptops went from 16:10 to 16:9 and we couldn't understand why. 16:9 was for TVs and watching movies. 16:10 was for computers to do work.

While it's true finding 16:9 desktop backgrounds is easier, and watching movies and TVs without black bars is nice, 16:10 is much nice when actually using a computer to do work. Taskbars, toolbars, tabbars, headersbars etc take up a lot of precious vertical space, leaving less space for application content.

57
submitted 2 years ago by kjetil@lemmy.world to c/pics@lemmy.world
[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I'm so torn on this.. on the one hand always online DRM "leased" games from what's effectively a monopoly is bad.

On the other hand.. Proton good. Like really really good. Valve has done so much for Linux gaming through their Steam Machine and now Steam Deck initiatives

[-] kjetil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Simply put, X11 is the bottom of the graphics stack, i.e. everything that makes Linux have more than just a command line has historically been built on top of X11

X11 is OLD. Like really old. And has a bunch of problem because of it (no variable refresh rate, no good multi monitor support, no proper fractional scaling , tearing, no security etc) It's also very mature. Somehow developers have managed to build a decent user experience out of the old X11

The Wayland protocol was designed to overcome the shortcomings of X11 and replace it. Wayland is now at the cusp of being a fully functional complete replacement for X11. It already is for many (most?) use cases.

Many Applications that are not made for Wayland will still run in Wayland, but they run in a fake X11 server inside called Xwayland. But native Wayland is better (performance, security, features)

Wayland very good on AMD and Intel these days. Nvidia was unsupported, but last year nVidia made a business decision to support EGL(?) so with fresh drives work has begun in Gnome and KDE to support Nvidia in Wayland. I'm not sure how mature Nvidia on Wayland is yet

view more: next ›

kjetil

joined 2 years ago