There is a difference between a political commentator who makes their living spreading rhetoric that is hateful to the countries government and is travelling with the intention of spreading that rhetoric directly and some random travelling for leisure who said some shit on social media that was hateful to the countries government. There is also something to be said for if the rhetoric is actually causing measurable harm to large numbers of people vs if the rhetoric maybe hurt a handful of peoples feelings or seemed embarrassing to the administration.
Really speed running the geneva suggestions
How exactly is this different from the drone strike campaigns of the last 15 years? Genuinely asking, seems bad but not particularly different at first glance.
Wild, I was pretty sure his neck just did that.
I'm still really new to it but it can be painful to get right but it's really not painful at all once you're situated right and used to it. Your balls just go up the front of your pelvis kinda behind and to either side of the base of the shaft. And then everything else just gets tucked away. The weirdest part for me was leaning against the counter while doing dishes and realising that my balls were at the front of my pelvis instead of safely down below and it felt very weird (though somehow affirming) to be sensitive in a very different way. Also, I'm not there yet but HRT tends to shrinks your balls which helps.
US is not a signatory to the ICC
I feel like this has way more to do with smartphones and apple than chromebooks but sure.
It is not, less lethal is the proper term.
Maybe if they spent more money making it a good experience that respects customers and developers alike and less on bribing platform exclusives they would be better?
The 250 year thing is basically complete BS
kerrigan778
joined 6 months ago
I do not believe for a second that the two things are objectively equal, saying they're the same kind of thing doesn't make them the same thing. Just because you are claiming to not be able to tell the difference between two kinds of "hateful speech" does not mean there isn't an objective difference. This is the same kind of nonsense free speech absolutism argument you see ad nauseum online, that you either can't have consequences for any kind of speech or live with consequences for all kinds of speech. It's nonsense and usually isn't even in good faith.