There are two main problems in my opinion, and they are both related to the "fuel". First, uranium is rare and you often need to buy it from other countries. For instance, Russia. Not great. Second, it is not renewable energy. We can't rely on nuclear fission in the long run. Then there's also the issue of waste, which despite not being as critical as some argue, is still a problem to consider
Without regard for the political content (which I agree with), this is a very bad and unfunny meme.
I think I could have backed off after moving to Arch. The point of no return was Rust
Oh, how surprising...
The dream
When I tried it out it was slooowww. GUI designers should focus on making software usable, not "sleek"
Really? They always worked very well for me, with a bit of fiddling around
This so much. I absolutely cannot stand Windows anymore.
Jokes on you, I have two monitors and 9 workspaces (I don't know how you call these)
Why would anybody use NTFS? btrfs ftw. Also all EFI partitions are FAT. And lastly, if you want a USB stick to be portable across operating systems, FAT is still the way to go
lemmy.world blocked it. I guess it is their right to do so, if you want to keep access to it move to another instance (it is not healthy that so many people are on LW).
All of those were caused by human mistake. But this does not mean that they must be discarded. Because human mistake happens. If it is with a solar panel, it's inconsequential. Not with a nuclear reactor. So yes, it is an issue to consider, but in truth all it means is that we have to be VERY careful