607
submitted 9 months ago by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Godric@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago
[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 43 points 9 months ago

People are starving every damn day under Capitalism and there is no famine going on. This isn't the dunk you think it is.

[-] Icalasari@fedia.io 18 points 9 months ago

No it isn't, but it does highlight the main issue:

Communism would work if it weren't for people trying to co-opt it for power

Fully Automated Luxury Space Communism is the end goal (since, it being automated, means there should effectively be no way to hijack it), but we ain't getting there for a long time. Let's go for socialism first and work from there

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Communism would work if it weren't for people trying to co-opt it for power

As long as there exists a way to gain power over others, someone will do it. That's just the reality of our nature, unfortunately.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Those famines happened every 10 years before communism, they happened ONCE during in each location and not again since.

In the meantime capitalism had that death total due to forced starvation every 7 years on average.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 41 points 9 months ago

Do the people saying that communism is bad think capitalism is good?

[-] MissJinx@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

you knoe there isn't only 2 choices right? Thay can both have good and bad sides. Maybe try some mix of it fisrt

[-] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago

Dialectical Materialism. Right now, they are. You either work towards communism or capitalism moves towards consolidation of capital. Those are your choices.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 9 months ago
[-] lud@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago
[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 9 points 9 months ago

As usual the best answer lies somewhere between the two extremes

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago

we tried that before though, improving things temporarily, but it will never be permanent until we extinguish the owner class.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The trick is not falling for the lie that social democracy is meeting socialism in the middle.

Social Democracy is just liberalism with enlightened self interest. Is it better than other capitalists models?

Sure. That doesn't make it the end goal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 39 points 9 months ago

I was in my early 20s when the Soviet occupation collapsed here, the victims here were everyone not high up in the party.

Sure, capitalism fucking sucks but pretending the USSR was anything other than just bourgeoisie rule is delusional. The oligarchs were just called the communist party then.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

shock therapy was not a socialist, but a capitalist plan after the ussr ended.

[-] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago

Yea, no shit, nothing to do with what I said though.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 9 months ago

shock therapy happened upon the collapse of the ussr

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] xionzui@sh.itjust.works 29 points 9 months ago
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Yeah. Nobody’s ever done real communism on a national scale. As in, not just being a dictatorship in charge of everything that funnels money and power to the top while giving communism lip service and the people get screwed.

[-] Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 9 months ago

Ah yes, my grandparents, the landlords. Wait hol' up, they were working people, not landlords. GDR fucked them regardless.

"bUt tHAT wASn'T rEaL ComMunIsM" If neither the USSR nor China could achieve true Communism, then maybe it isn't so much a realistic goal as a utopian ideal, a convenient justification for all kinds of crimes against humanity that occur in its pursuit.

[-] DeprecatedCompatV2@programming.dev 28 points 9 months ago

It's weird, we tried having a small group of people control the flow of capital and it was unpopular each time. Let's try it again but call it something different or say it was something else when we tried it before.

[-] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago

The thing is, both USSR/China and USA don’t fit the ideals of Communism. While in USA suffers from the gap between rich and poor, USSR/China suffered from the difference between the people and the government. Just because you get rid of economical suppression doesn’t mean you can’t have political suppression. Sure these countries had economical problems but a lot of their problems could have been avoided if the government would have actually worked for the people and not for themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

it WAS real communism and ur grandparents probably deserved it. absolute worst case senario no system is perfect and good people still get fucked over sometimes for no good reason, difference is under capitalism it is constant under socialism it is rare.

[-] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

Take it from a self-identified pinko commie and someone born in one of those regimes, it was not real communism. It was authoritarianism with a strong (but at times selectively applied) social safety net. To say that their grandparents deserved it when you know nothing about them is fucking absurd. You're not helping your point or cause. You're just being a child.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As I understand it, "real communism" is supposed to be some kind of stateless society. As the GDR was, well, a state, it clearly did not achieve that. Nor would it ever have been likely to, as actually doing what was ideologically promised would have required those with power within that system to relinquish that power, which is incredibly rare as it conflicts with human nature.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

It wasnt the GDR, it was the totality of global Capital conspiring to defeat the biggest threat to their power structure. What did the GDR do specifically that 'fucked' your grandparents?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Let's see: Communism A system of government where the country's wealth is concentrated into a small, ruling class of billionaires, who use the media they own to keep the lower classes fighting with each other while they . . . the rich . . . run off with all the farking money.

Oh wait. that's capitalism. I don't know how I got those two systems confused.

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 months ago

I'm pretty sure the leftcommunists and anarchists and worker councils requesting for power to be really handed to the soviets which were purged by Lenin and Trotsky weren't actually landlords. But you never know, people from .ml may think people unwilling to obey the bolsheviks get labeled landlords too.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 9 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] elfahor 16 points 9 months ago

Without regard for the political content (which I agree with), this is a very bad and unfunny meme.

[-] MissJinx@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago
[-] linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml 23 points 9 months ago

u see im very smart if u live under a society u can not criticize it, what RIGHT does a salve have to criticize slavery when they do the masters bidding and eat the food the master provides and wears the clothes the master provides.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 18 points 9 months ago

The iPhone workers designed, workers made, workers marketed, workers transported, workers sold and "landlords" got paid for. It really is a perfect illustration of the issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Godric@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

People fleeing communist countries en mass sure is a mystery. Who could ever know why they built the Berlin Wall or why Cuban families risk their children on rafts to get to a capitalist country

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 21 points 9 months ago

You are aware that the vast majority of undocumented immigrants are coming to America from other capitalist countries right?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

Living conditions for the majority of the population in Cuba are far better than in any capitalist Latin American country. This is despite the brutal blockade on Cuba by the burger empire. Please go make a clown of yourself elsewhere.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] itsralC@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago

I don't disagree but this meme is ass lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
607 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

46405 readers
1380 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS