:3
Having my chosen name on documents despite it not being my legal name yet, for example my therapist used it for the invoice they sent me
Wäre ja akzeptabel, wenn am Schluss nur die Unternehmen mit den Sicherheitslücken darunter leiden, aber die deren Daten dabei geleakt werden leiden halt auch darunter also keine wirklich gute Option.
Für gaming PCs würde ich im Zweifel lieber ältere Hardware kaufen und eine dedizierte Grafikkarte einbauen. Wirklich interessant dürfte es aber für Systeme wie etwaige Steam Deck Nachfolger werden
Oh, did they? Easily unlocking the bootloader was exactly what I chose my OnePlus 6t for. Sad to see how fast they dropped that.
ja, zum beispiel weil es schon allein heute dazu 3 artikel auf tagesschau.de gab. Gratis Reichweite
vergleichst du ernsthaft die regenbogenfahne mit dem hakenkreuz???
entschuldigung aber die reine ironie hinter deinem kommentar bringt mich dazu auch zu kommentieren. du bemängelst dass die argumentation rein auf gefühlten wahrheiten beruht und führst dann das argument an, dass du keine beschwerden in umgekehrter richtung gehört hast, also deine rein subjektive wahrnehmung. und schließt dann mit einer behauptung ohne jeden beleg ab.
I fucking love these posts
shonk gun shonk gun
Please stop spreading misinformation funded by the meat industry https://www.petakillsanimalsscam.com/
Straight up misinformation. The nuclear phase out was already decided years ago after fukushima. This entire thing is just about a decision wether or not to extend the lifetime of the remaining 3 reactors in germany to counteract possible gas shortages due to russias attack on ukriane. And in fact their lifetime was extended for a few months to avoid energy shortages during the winter 22/23 which habeck decided against voices in his own party. The supposed "manipulation" is that a section apparently got deleted between two drafts of a document which contained the conclusion that it would be feasible to continue operating those reactors for a few years. Just, if you actually read the damn documents, this section never actually existed in there. What version 1 actually does contain however is the conclusion that wether or not its feasible to keep those reactors running for a few more years could not be made without consulting the operators of those reactors. Whats also in there is that all reactors lack the necessary safety certification for continued operation and that necessary staff was not available. The only real difference between those documents is the added conclusion in version 2, which you would expect to find in such a document presented to a minister.
document version 1: https://assets.cicero.de/2024-04/2022-03-01_Atomaufsicht_Version1.pdf version 2: https://assets.cicero.de/2024-04/2022-03-03_Atomaufsicht_Version2.pdf both hosted by the magazine that "uncovered" that entire "scandal", so yeah, their own sources dont support what they're saying