They would've surrendered by now if not for the belief they could win with western equipment.
Did you think they were going to take back Crimea? At what point do you acknowledge you may be a victim of propaganda?
Answer: never. Propaganda is only the tool of the enemy, always. Lol.
funding Ukraine is an efficient investment.
That’s not “for the west”.
Funding Ukraine is an efficient investment for the west...
Might wanna brush up on your reading comprehension.
You'll understand when you're older.
That's weird, I was reading expecting to see some kind of simpson's quote or reference like they predicted 9/11. Instead, he mentions how "dozens of the writers of The Simpsons went to Harvard."
I think Simpsons is very interesting because so many people get the wrong things from it. A lot of people don't view Simpsons as satire (which it is); they view it as an excuse for their behavior. It's ok to be a lazy, ignorant, alcoholic because that's what Homer is. He still loves his family, right? And that makes it okay. (not)
I typed this out before reading further, and I'm glad he mentioned the Monorail episode because it's exactly what came to mind. However, that episode was clear satire. It doesn't make sense for the audience to think giving in to a conman is the correct thing to do, but that is what has happened to a lot of cities across the US.
It's weird because I think Simpsons has had the effect that he's talking about, it's just I'm torn on whether or not it was the real intention of the artists.
If it was, that's absolutely mind-boggling illuminati shit. I don't think it goes that deep, though.
Blame everyone who nominated hillary over Bernie :(
Thank you for your support :)
How come nobody mentions that Russia has over 4x the population of Ukraine?
Zionists need to pay for this.
They can't keep getting away with it.
What does the contract say?
Imagine if scientists working on cures had the budget of the US military...
To be fair, even if it did, I could still see it being unconstitutional to the supreme court.
We don't want to admit it, but we kind of weasled our way to ban automatic weapons which is why there is only a "practical" ban instead of an absolute one.
i.e. You can legally own full-auto weapons if you spend the money to do so.
I think it would be very interesting if some right-wingers tried to do something like this but frame it as though you can "only buy handguns/semiautomatics made before a certain date, gotta pay all these fees, etc."
That could force the supreme court to look at whether the original "ban" on automatics is actually constitutional.
What about the poor conscripted Ukrainians getting slaughtered because they've been duped into thinking they can win?
You don't ever think about those, huh.